Let me explain what I mean: are the dark side and the light side of the Force just two different parts of the force with nothing between, or are they two sides of a spectrum? Can a Force-user be in between?
Legends is okay, but not preferred.
Depends who you ask
There are a lot of different views between the Force, some which have a Light and Dark side, some which don't, and some which have some other view.
The Jedi Order's view
In Legends, this philosophy was called the Living Force. This view stated that the Force was divided between light and dark, with no state in between. Those who try to walk in the middle are eventually drawn to one side or the other, and the Jedi are always mindful of falling to the dark side.
Binary dark and light, no in-between.
Anakin Skywalker encountered The Ones who are a family of Force users that some believed to be god-like beings who embodied the Force, with the Son being the Dark Side, the Daughter being the Light Side, and the Father being a sort of balance keeping the two in check.
There is some debate among fans about whether or not The Ones are true embodiments of the Force, or merely a family of immortal beings who were symbolically drawn to aspects they saw as representative of the Force.
If they were true embodiments, then that would definitively describe the nature of the Force, including the fact that a "balance" between light and dark exists. But the fact that the Ones have been given a species name, and that all three died, yet the Force continued to exist, suggests that they are merely just another group of people, immortal though they may be, who have their own viewpoint of the nature of the Force and modeled themselves after it.
Regardless, their existence seemed to be relatively unknown, and Anakin Skywalker still believed in the Living Force, so this codified belief seems to be a minority view.
Binary dark and light, but there is a well-defined in-between "balance".
Unifying Force (Legends)
Adhering to a philosophy called the Unifying Force, the Force is one single entity that is neither light nor dark. It was something akin to a deity that did not take sides. Note that there does seem to be some overlap here with the Living Force; Yoda seemed to believe in the Living Force and the concepts of a Light and Dark Side, but believed that visions were neither.
No concept of dark or light exists.
Adherents to the Potentium view of the Force believed that the natural state of the Force was inherently good, and that there is no light and dark side. Rather, it is a tool and only the intentions of the users of the force to do evil that are evil. If you want to use Force Lightning all day with good intentions, that's absolutely ok. This view was heresy for the Jedi Order, since it denied that the Dark Side of the Force existed.
The Force is inherently good, only your intentions can be evil.
Way of the Dark (Legends)
The opposite of the Potentium view, the Way of the Dark asserts that the Force is inherently evil, and that ultimately it trends towards destruction. This takes the view that any concepts of good are irrelevant since you are going against the natural way of the Force.
The Force is inherently evil, and good is an ultimately meaningless concept.
The Insidious Force (Legends)
A view with some commonalities to the Unifying Force, the Insidious Force states that the Force is like an uncaring, sinister deity. After all, nearly every conflict in the Galaxy Far, Far Away is a result of the Force. It seems adherents do subscribe to the idea that there may be a light and dark side, but it seems to be inconsequential
The Force is inherently uncaring and sinister, light and dark may exist, but are inconsequential.
Aing-Tii beliefs (Legends)
To the Aing-Tii monks, The Force is neither light nor dark, but rather a spectrum like a rainbow. In other words, you can be more light or more dark, but can also be right in the middle as well. These monks typically stayed on their homeworld, so few knew about this philosophy.
Light and dark exist, but as two ends on a spectrum.
In Disney canon, it appears that the Force is pretty definitively drawn between the Light and Dark Side, and if there is an in-between, it doesn't exist as a spectrum. In Legends, there are a lot of views that do allow for an in-between, or suggest that The Force is of a different nature.
To the first part it seems to me the dark side and light side have in themselves been presented in pretty binary terms, but to the second I would say that there is some degree of a spectrum with actual Force-users, in the sense that they can draw somewhat on emotions associated with the dark side but balance them out with light side emotions in a way that prevents them from "falling" to the dark side.
I base this answer more on what Lucas has said about the way the Force works than what has been explicitly presented in canon material (maybe someone else will be able to find some good canon sources, but Lucas is kind of the 'word of God' about Star Wars so his comments at least would seem to carry more weight than Legends material written by authors who didn't necessarily consult him). If you look at the "Behind the scenes" section of the "legends" section of the Chosen One article on wookieepedia, there are a bunch of quotes about Lucas' concept of the meaning of the dark side and the light side and the need for individuals to balance both sides within themselves. For example, at 16:40 in this interview Lucas says:
"Compassion" and "greed" seems like a fairly binary distinction, but people obviously have both sides in themselves.
Likewise, at 53 seconds into this video showing a taped discussion with the writers of The Clone Wars, Lucas talks about the dark side and the light side as representing selfishness vs. selflessness, again a fairly binary distinction. But he also distinguishes between people who "balance" the two sides and people who "go to the dark side", becoming entirely fixated on selfish desires and the fear and anger that result from being worried the objects of their desires will be take away from them. Quoting from the video:
Page 182 of Star Wars: The Annotated Screenplays also discusses Lucas' ideas during a certain part of the writing of The Empire Strikes Back about how Luke has to draw on the dark side to some extent when using certain Jedi abilities, but this won't cause him to fall unless he fails to balance it with the light side and allows the dark side to start "using him":
As far as Legends materials goes, there is some evidence there too that individuals can draw on both dark and light sides without falling to the dark side. For example, look at the wookieepedia article on the Gray Jedi, which in one of two uses of the term can refer to "Force-users who walked the line between the light and dark sides of the Force without surrendering to the dark side". And the "vaapad" lightsaber technique developed by Mace Windu in Legends, also known as Form VII lightsaber combat, was said in a few books to draw on "dark" emotions like anger and the desire to crush one's enemies, and use them in the service of the light. For example, in chapter 5 of the book Shatterpoint Mace wrote in his journal of feeling a dangerous "blood fever" during a particular battle, "the lust for victory. To win, at any cost." He also wrote "It's not overpowering; I haven't fallen that far. Yet. It's more a preference. An expectation. An anticipation that has been disappointed." And of Vaapad, he wrote:
And in chapter 15 of the Revenge of the Sith novelization, Windu says:
It is a spectrum.
There is one Force, the difference is how you approach it, what you want to get out of it.
The light side focuses on controlling selfish desires for the benefit of everyone.
Because The Force represents so much power, it is almost impossible to use it in a non-selfish manner unless you have a strong motivating reason not to. A good analogy is a $1,000,000 daily allowance. What would you do with it? Would you use it to get what you want? to help people? to steal things you can't buy? The Jedi believe that people, especially those who cannot control their emotions and desires, will eventually start using their power for selfishness. This is why they always talk about the light and dark side as absolutes, it is almost impossible to be neutral.
Anakin is a good example. While he wanted to do what was right, his primary desires were to get what he wanted. This was shown when he gets angry about how long it took to get on the Jedi council, when he attacked the sand-people villagers when his Mom died (rather than finding out why they were acting strange) in order to exact his revenge, and the whole ending of Episode III. He knew what he wanted and he did not care who he hurt or the amount of damage he would do, as long as he was able to get what he wanted. It was his strong, uncontrolled emotions which pushed him to fight so hard for what he wanted (despite the destruction), which is why strong emotions like love, hate, anger, envy, and fear are counseled and guarded against by the Jedi, but embraced by the Sith.
One additional "side" is mischief. While not as strong a drive for most humans, a Loki or Puck character who acts to bring change and "keep things interesting" would not fall into the self serving nature of the dark side or the selflessness of the light side. Those in this category would technically be gray since they can do light and dark side things, but they are not defined by those actions (their light or dark side choices cannot be used to predict future decisions).
'The Force' is an absolute in itself, like the Daoist Dao. But we can be in touch with it, and be at one with it to varying degrees. Therefore we have a 'paduan learner' or a master, like Yoda. These ideas are just 'transliterations' and re-packaged versions of ancient Daoist or Buddhist philosophical concepts.
In Knights of the Old Republic, Jolee Bindo is a "grey Jedi" - a former Light-side Jedi who became disenchanted with the Jedi ways and now takes a neutral moral middleground. The game, like most games involving Jedi, represents the Force as a spectrum between pure good and pure evil.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?