Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The USS Enterprise NCC-1701 appears to have a clear dome over the bridge:

NCC - 1701

There is a scene in the pilot that zooms in and peers into the bridge from space:

bridge from space

Does the crew have the ability to see through the dome into space?

share|improve this question
    
Isn't that screenshot from the remastered versions? Sheesh. First Lucas and the prequel trilogy, now Sternbach and Okuda have done it to the real Star Trek. Sigh. –  Tango Mar 24 '12 at 4:05
1  
This is the remastered shot, not the original, but the intent is the same. –  SteveED Mar 24 '12 at 22:48

5 Answers 5

up vote 5 down vote accepted

We never see the complete bridge ceiling from inside in any episode of TOS. We see it for the first time in TAS and it is definitely opaque.

It could have been that the producers realized that showing space on the inside ceiling was beyond the FX technology of the time and decided to give up on it after the pilot.

I believe that the pilot episode zoom in may have represented a more symbolic approach showing the audience that the bridge was on top (ie most important part) of the ship.

share|improve this answer
    
Roddenberry rejected TAS as non-canon as soon as they got the go to start on Star Trek: Phase II (which became _Star Trek: The Motion Picture). When he was offered the chance to do TAS, he thought he'd never have any other chance to do Trek on TV or film, so he took it, but once he got another chance, he basically wiped the slate clean and said TAS never happened. –  Tango Mar 24 '12 at 16:59
    
Roddenberry accepted TAS as cannon by the 2nd season of TNG, and probably after he realized he could make quite a lot of money off of selling the rights to VHS and disc. –  SteveED Mar 24 '12 at 22:47

In "The Cage", there's a shot at the beginning of the episode where the camera comes right through a transparent dome. It's evident that the Enterprise at least had a transparent dome at some point.

share|improve this answer
    
I edited my question to add a picture of it. Thanks! –  Major Stackings Mar 23 '12 at 23:40

No. What you see is a retro filming style. The Dome was opaque.
I have discovered a scene in Season 3 Episode 2 to prove it:
Dome of USS Enterprise NCC-1701 from inside

Thanks to @TangoOversway for the screenshot idea..

share|improve this answer
    
Uh, that's the same part of the dome that I show in the screen shots -- the part above the red boarder on the lower ceiling with the lights on it. –  Tango Mar 24 '12 at 16:38
1  
But, it covers a large part of dome & gives a feeling that its really a dome (from interior view). –  Sachin Shekhar Mar 24 '12 at 16:44
    
No more than shown in the wide shot of the empty bridge. Both basically come to the limit of the "dome" on the original bridge set. –  Tango Mar 24 '12 at 17:01
    
The point is to cover upper part of dome.. not surface area! –  Sachin Shekhar Mar 24 '12 at 17:04
1  
I like this answer. The image really makes the dome visible. –  Kalamane May 12 '12 at 20:42

The top dome over the bridge is opaque. Here are a few screenshots from various episodes to illustrate that. (By the way, that's an exterior light, not a view of the Bridge.)

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
1  
None of your photos display bottom-to-up view of dome.. –  Sachin Shekhar Mar 24 '12 at 1:12
1  
@SachinShekhar: While they don't show directly overhead, they do show the dome itself. And if you look at the models, such as the one linked to, there is a lit area above or overhead, so nothing on the exterior indicates any window, either. –  Tango Mar 24 '12 at 4:03
    
In real life there was no overhead dome to allow lights to be placed to brighten the set for shooting. Also, the walls came loose so that if they were filming one wall, the opposite one was pulled away for cameras. –  Oldcat May 20 at 17:27

(yes, this is rather late)

There would, in reality, be zero need to have a transparent ceiling on a starship bridge. The bridge will very likely not be anywhere near the top of the ship in any case - why put your command center and senior personnel in such an obvious, exposed location? One good phaser hit and the ship is decapitated.

Oceangoing vessels, aircraft etc. put the bridge on top so they can see where they are going - ships that rely on sensors (like submarines) don't. A submarine's bridge is in the main pressure hull below the sail, and it's only there because the command officers need quick access to the periscope and occasionally the top of the sail. The latest generation of subs (Virginia class) don't use optical periscopes and the bridge is now more-or-less in the center of the boat on deck 2. Of course, this wasn't the case in 1966 (or even 1987).

share|improve this answer
    
While Starfleet is militarily structured, defense it not their sole purpose. At least equally important are exploration, diplomacy, research... None of the Enterprises were intended as ships of war. First contact becomes way harder if show up with a battle cruiser, with ranking officers hiding deep in the belly of the ship. –  Einer May 20 at 13:24
    
A sub's bridge is on top of the sail. The compartment in the pressure hull with the periscope, chart table, and commanding officer is the control room. –  Codes with Hammer May 20 at 13:41
    
I'll accept that technicality, but no one stays on a sub's top-of-the-sail bridge for any significant length of time. When the dive buzzer goes off, the 1-2 people that can fit up there quickly go below and close the hatch. It has no significant apparatus to operate the vessel. The sub's control room serves the same purpose as the bridge on any other vessel. –  paul May 20 at 13:51
    
In this case, the Bridge of the Enterprise is indeed on top of the saucer under the dome. –  Major Stackings May 20 at 13:54
    
No, they weren't intended as warships, but every one is capable of stepping up to the plate when needed. If you were captain, would you travel the galaxy with just a thin piece of transparent aluminum between you and the hostilities of nature? ( 10-forward and the cabins with windows can be evacuated easily, the bridge cannot). My point is basically that there are zero reasons to put the bridge of a large spacecraft on the top with a big window. If anyone belongs up there with the dome it would be stellar cartography or the officer's lounge. –  paul May 20 at 13:57

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.