Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Considering the "Han shot first" controversy, is there any Version that have been stated canon over the other?

The 2006 DVD had two versions—the 2004 changes and the original theatrical version. The theatrical version features no changes, including Han Solo shooting without Greedo firing a shot.

So, this leave me dubious of which one is considered Canon.

share|improve this question
18  
Just as there is the "zeroeth law" of robotics, there is a canon which outranks all other canon in Star Wars and applies to only a total of less than 15 seconds of screen time. This "zeroeth level" of Star Wars canon states that no matter what, Han shot first. –  Tango Oct 6 '11 at 17:14
    
I'm not advocating one or the other, just that what really matters in the end is that he shot BETTER. –  MPelletier Oct 7 '11 at 4:20
    
The cannon shot first. –  SQB Oct 9 at 9:21
1  
@Tango: H-Canon. We should should make this a thing! –  ThePopMachine Oct 13 at 15:15

3 Answers 3

up vote 26 down vote accepted

According to several references I found, DVDs are considered the canon, so (sadly from my POV), Greedo shot first.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_canon:

The Holocron is divided into 5 levels (in order of precedence): G-canon, T-canon, C-canon, S-canon, and N-canon.

  • G-canon is absolute canon; the movies (their most recent release), ...

Please note that, as the question noted, the latest release (as of 3/2011, it's "2006 DVD", but the answer might change once the rumored Blu-Ray Star Wars is released) had two versions — the 2004 changed "Greedo short first by a small margin" and the original theatrical "Han short first" version.

Despite both version co-existing on the DVD, the release explicitly notes that the original theatrical version with Han shooting first is "bonus material", and thus not the "main" version. Therefore, Greedo shot first according to G-canon rules above.

share|improve this answer
    
That the point, "their most recent release" of the DVD has 2 version, one where he shoot first and one where Greedo shoot first. –  DavRob60 Mar 7 '11 at 17:59
1  
@DavRob60 - upon further research, the theatrical version is "bonus material" and thus secondary. Sorry, Greedo first it is :(. I updated the answer. –  DVK Mar 7 '11 at 19:27
5  
+1 however unfortunate it is, this is the case. The current version of the first film has Greedo shooting first. My inner child weeps, but cannot deny this. –  Jeff Mar 7 '11 at 19:32
10  
@Jeff My inner child just stomps his footsie and yells HAN SHOT FIRST. For this child-in-a-man, George Lucas can go... do whatever. Han shot first. It's in character. For me. –  Jürgen A. Erhard Mar 8 '11 at 15:52
    
But aren't the DVDs now superseded by the blu-ray (which I got when it came out and still haven't had time to watch)? –  Tango Oct 7 '11 at 2:14

According to the comparison of all versions of Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope by Chris Gould at DVD Active. (search for "Greedo"), Greedo still shoot first in the Blu-ray release.

From this still image it might look like the scene has remained unchanged for the Blu-ray release, but this is not the case. Approximately ten frames have been shaved off of the shot immediately before Greedo fires, making it appears as though Han and the bounty hunter shoot at roughly the same time. It’s still not great but it’s the best version since the original.

Greedo still shoot first

share|improve this answer

The novel "Star Wars" written by Lucas has Han shooting first. This is mirrored in the first theatrical release of the movie. The point is both that Han is very good, and that Greedo committed a fatal mistake by allowing Han's hands to get under the table to his blaster.

The Special Edition re-release changed this to make Han's head jerk so Greedo's shot misses (his shot misses wildly anyway) and then Han fires. This makes him more of a badass and a little less of a cold-blooded executioner, and thus hopefully more likeable. However, it reduces his character development; by the end of the movie, all the things Han's done have stacked against him, so you wouldn't expect him to come back and help the Rebels.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.