Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why don't the people alive in the Walking dead use animals?

Since animals are not affected by the virus they could make excellent zombie killers.
Also those animals, if carnivorous, would have an almost infinite food/zombie supply.

I'm thinking of:

  • Dogs
  • Bears
  • Crocodiles

Dogs being the most logical choice of course.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by NominSim, John O, Kyle Jones, Micah, phantom42 Jan 12 '13 at 6:17

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
On a side note, this would make people in africa or asia with a trained elephant, practically unbeatable. Since the skin of an elephant is too thick to penetrate while biting. (Human bite) –  user11859 Jan 10 '13 at 15:40
    
How on Earth would you know that? –  Niall C. Jan 10 '13 at 15:48
2  
How would you know about biting elephants? –  Niall C. Jan 10 '13 at 15:53
2  
Following the perspective of a pack of wild dogs would be a cool story idea. –  Chris B. Behrens Jan 10 '13 at 16:03
1  
In a recent BBC documentary the hide of a dead elephant was too thick for a leopard to bit through. It was even too thick for a hyaena to bite through and they have an immensely powerful bite. How the hyaenas got into the dead elephant was, erm, surprising :-) Anyhow, it doesn't seem likely that a human would succeed where leopards and hyaenas failed. –  John Rennie Jan 11 '13 at 9:40

1 Answer 1

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Using animals to attack walkers would be an extremely ineffective tactic.

Depending on size, dogs may attack by attempting to knock a human to the ground, or they may attack by biting, and then tugging and worrying with their teeth. This is extremely painful to a human, and either the shock of the pain or the weight of the dog frequently knocks the victim to the ground.

This would not be very effective on a walker. Even if the dog knocked the walker to the ground, the walker would simply grab the dog, and attempt to pull it close to its mouth so it could start eating it (we've seen multiple instances of walkers eating animals, ranging from raccoon to horses, so its fairly certain that a dog would be a welcome snack).

The best a lone dog could hope to accomplish against a walker would be to rip large chunks of flesh out of it. The likelihood of biting-and-worrying attacks from a dog disabling or destroying a walker are pretty negligent, while the risk to the dog is fairly high.

However, dogs are at their most dangerous when attacking as a pack.

Tactics for a pack tend to be a bit different, in that prey is typically surrounded (assuming it isn't fleeing, which wouldn't be the case with a walker), and harried with feints from all sides, until the prey is on the ground (usually after being hamstrung or pulled down from behind).

This would likely be quite effective against a single walker. The feinting attacks would reduce the risk to any single member of the pack, and once on the ground, the pack would be able to do a lot of tearing damage with little risk of the walker being able to force any of the dogs near its mouth.

Unfortunately, walkers also show pack tendencies. While they don't attack in a concerted fashion, the simple presence of multiple walkers would be a major problem for a pack of dogs.

While the dog pack surrounded one walker, any other walkers present would likely be trying to grab any of the dogs. It would be difficult for a pack to keep one walker surrounded, while evading multiple other walkers.

Even if they did take down one walker, they would be extremely vulnerable to attack from other walkers while they savaged the downed victim.

Realistically, it seems unlikely that dogs would be at all effective against walkers unless the dogs outnumbered them at least 3-4 to 1, or if the walkers were extremely scattered.

Other animals might be more or less effective in fighting walkers in varying amounts, but all but the most massive or well defended would be quickly overwhelmed by large groups of walkers.

To address specific ones mentioned:

  • A bear would probably be very effective 1-on-1, or even be able to take out small groups of walkers, but it would likely take quite some time to train it, and would still be a hazard to any humans nearby, no matter how well trained.
  • A crocodile would be very effective at killing a single walker, if the walker approached too closely to the water where the crocodile lurked. I don't believe you could "train" a crocodile, though, and it wouldn't be effective outside of the water: the effectiveness of a crocodile vs. a walker would come from the "death roll", which typically happens once a victim is dragged into water, and which would likely dismember a walker quite quickly. A crocodile is not going to destroy one walker, and then immediately go after another, however, so its not terribly practical.
  • An elephant would likely be the most useful in a fight against walkers. A charging elephant would likely be able to knock down and trample large groups of walkers. However, it seems that an elephant's skin is thick (up to 1 inch), but very sensitive. I did find one site that claims that the skin is very thin along the abdomen (presumably underneath the animal, as opposed to the flanks), mouth, ears, and anus. I'm not sure if a walker could bite through the skin of an elephant, but elephants are pretty intelligent, and walkers were biting it in sensitive spots, it would likely become difficult to get the elephant to continue to engage large groups of walkers.

This all assumes that these animals are not subject to the effects of the virus, of course.

One final difficulty with the idea of keeping such animals as guardians is food. Even if you assume that walker flesh is edible to animals that eat carrion (which seems a BIG assumption to me), keeping a steady supply of this meat without overwhelming the animal would be difficult.

Keeping an elephant supplied with sufficient food is completely impractical. According to the Smithsonian National Zoo, an elephant would require hundreds of pounds of food each day:

Our elephants each eat between 125 and 175 pounds of food a day. The bulk of their diet is hay. They also eat fruits, vegetables, and a fortified pellet food. In the wild, where they must expend a great deal more energy to find food, elephants eat two to three times this amount of plant material, from grass to trees.

share|improve this answer
    
Even with training, it's hard to say that animals would be willing to attack walkers. I don't recall any examples in the Walking Dead off the top of my head, but in other popular zombie literature, animals tend towards actively avoiding zombies. –  Steam Jan 11 '13 at 14:40
    
@Yawus It's been a long time since I read World War Z, so I may be getting this completely wrong, but I vaguely remember a bear that attacked some zombies and saved one of the characters. Generally yes, though, most animals are frequently portrayed as avoiding the "unnaturalness" of zombies. –  Beofett Jan 11 '13 at 14:43
    
@Beofett - Animals tend to avoid the 'unnaturalness' of regular humans in general. Even domesticated animals will follow the "Once bit, twice shy" rule (pardon the pun). Animals that prey on humans usually only do so for food, or as a last resort if they're backed into a corner. They certainly wouldn't go out of their way to put themselves in danger to save your scrawny ass. –  Robotnik Jan 13 '13 at 22:58
    
@Robotnik I don't believe I attributed altruistic intent to any animals. From what I recall, the bear was attacking walkers in general, and just happened to do so at a time that was fortuitous to the character. I certainly didn't mean to imply that the bear was walking through the woods, saw a human in trouble, and ran to the rescue out of the goodness of its heart :P –  Beofett Jan 14 '13 at 0:19
    
@Beofett - haha ok that makes more sense, although I'm sure Smokey would come to our aid in our time of need :P –  Robotnik Jan 14 '13 at 0:37