Tell me more ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I just finished reading a French translation of When HARLIE Was One by David Gerrold and I also just learned about Release 2.0 from Wikipedia:

A revised version, subtitled "Release 2.0", was published in 1988

The revised version was never published in French, and googling about it did not gave my any insight. So could anybody explain the differences?

share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I seem to remember that the "2.0" version is significantly longer, but can't verify that. However, I've found a few interesting things, although it took me half an hour of searching to do so.

Do-Overs: 10 speculative fiction books that got major rewrites after they were published

The original version of When HARLIE Was One was a finalist for the Hugo award and coined the phrase "computer virus" for a program that runs on computers without permission. The 1988 version, When HARLIE Was One Release 2.0, was revised to include more accurate information about computer science.

However, I found more here: Templeton Gate review

It's fortunate for us readers that Gerrold decided to revise this novel. The first novel was written rather early in his career, and although a good story, had some obvious rough spots that were ironed out in the revision. Although the corporate infighting I outlined above is the overt plot of the novel, the conversations between Harlie and Auberson are the real point of the book, and those were much more clearly deliniated [sic] in the revision.

According to that same page, Gerrold changed the ending somewhat as well.

Since the original book was a fix-up of four short stories, it seems reasonable that there would be many problems that a new writer wouldn't be all that good at smoothing over. It looks like Gerrold smoothed out some rough edges, made the computerey aspects of the book more "modern" (i.e., got rid of stuff that didn't age well), and expanded the characters' conversations a bit.

share|improve this answer

I've read both, 2.0 first, if a while ago. Aside from the tech updates, and as a result of them, the revised ending is more upbeat -- it offers closure, some joy, some sadness, and a sense of wonder about the future, inviting you "what will happen next, now that's sorted." Good package. I'm sure some of the minor plot points and the writing were also updated, but it's been too long to remember anything tangible. I came away thinking the revised version was noticeably superior however, and well worth having. YMMV.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.