Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why didn't they build narrow hallways and doors so that no dragon would fit in?

Dwarves are short and stouty, so why didn't they go "Tucker's Kobolds" on Smaug?

share|improve this question
18  
Why do people live in houses with 3-story-tall arched ceilings in the living room? they were showing off. –  Michael Edenfield Dec 15 '13 at 17:20
8  
I think dwarves building big things is common throughout scifi. In Brisingr , Eragon does ponder why the smallest of the races builds the biggest structures, and lingers on the conclusion that they do it as a way to compensate for their height. –  Manishearth Dec 15 '13 at 18:29
5  
Of course, there's no excuse for not rigging up the hallways and the whole mountain with insane magma flooding devices and other disturbingly ingenious death traps… Wait, wrong dwarves. –  millimoose Dec 16 '13 at 4:19
10  
Feng shui perhaps? –  TheMathemagician Dec 16 '13 at 9:55
4  
Another reason is as is described by Gimli in the Lord of the Rings books: Because when building their underground architecture, they don't decide what they want to build and then shape the world to fit - they look at the natural wonders, and build their architecture around that. If Tolkien's Dwarves built a large, cavernous city under the mountain, it's because there were already large caverns down there. The size was already determined by nature - the dwarves just enhanced its natural beauty. –  Wolfman Joe Dec 16 '13 at 18:42

4 Answers 4

According to the Tale of Years in Lord of the Rings, Erebor was founded in TA 1999 but dragons didn't reappear until TA 2570 (Smaug himself didn't descend on Erebor until TA 2770). No dragons come into the tales of the Second Age.

So that establishes a timescale of about 6,000 years between the previous appearance of dragons in Middle-earth (at the War of Wrath) and the reappearance of dragons in the Third Age, and establishes that Erebor was founded close to the top-end of this timescale.

From there it's obvious - as far as anyone was concerned dragons were an extinct creature that only appeared in stories from the Ancient World. There hadn't been a dragon seen in Middle-earth for about 5,500 years at the time Erebor was founded.

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks a lot for your answer! That explains why they were not prepared to fight dragons. But would you allow that Erebor as shown in the movie "The Hobbit" seemed woefully open to attacks. Single door, no inner ward, no murderholes, no portcullis. But then maybe I'm prejudiced by the game dwarf fortress, where defensive design is paramount ;) –  Truffant Dec 15 '13 at 16:43
5  
@Truffant See the opening of the first Hobbit movie for that - all were welcome, for trade/etc –  Izkata Dec 15 '13 at 22:00
1  
Your lore is certainly right. I can't speak as to their psychology, but I can say from any reasonable experience in real life, big rooms are necessarily impressive. Large buildings too. –  jaked122 Dec 16 '13 at 10:11
    
@Truffant - depends on whether or not they feel the need to defend from attacks. Most of the early history of Erebor occurred during the Watchful Peace, after all. –  Darth Satan Dec 16 '13 at 14:35
1  
The entire mountain was well protected, it was not only a city, an underground kingdom of the dwarves, the royal palace for kings of Durin's line, but also a stronghold. We have after all guardposts and watchtowers (maybe also some other fortifications and builings on the slopes of the Mountain) like on Ravenhill (I bet it won't appear in movie at all) the Back-door was invisible and protected by ,,dwarvish magic", nearly indestructible, so much that when dwarves in book wanted to use tools to tear it down, they only damaged them leaving no sign on the stone) and Front Gate was very defendable –  fantasywind Mar 25 at 13:20

The simple answer is that the dwarven halls of Erebor were meant to be palatial. They were the residence of a king and other noble individuals and were a display of great wealth. Tolkien's European sensibilities couldn't imagine anyone building sneaky little rat tunnels and tiny abodes unless they were poor, unless they were peasantry.

If you were to somehow visit the Queen of England today, walking into Buckingham Palace, you might think to yourself "this reception hall is big enough for a dragon to fit into". You live in a home where the highest ceiling is what, 9 or 10 ft tall? There would be plenty of rooms with ceilings double and triple that height, maybe more. Your home has doors at most 48" wide. But again, in the palaces of royalty, doors that are more than double that width are quite common.

How could Tolkien have envisioned Erebor other than as described?

share|improve this answer

One other consideration that might be worth mentioning: These halls were not for just people, but for horses and wagons too, and were main traffic routes in their city. A dwarf mountain is an entire city, not just a single palace. It would seem logical to have wide halls as a way to accommodate the massive amount of traffic through them.

share|improve this answer

Might it be that the dwarfs mined the mountains and re-used the mined area's to live in. The great hallway was once one of the rich finding places and as such mined to the full extend.

share|improve this answer
    
Good point! It would be interesting to imagine what a city might look like that was based on the patterns and structures of ore veins in the stone, and I suppose that's exactly what the Dwarven kingdoms were. –  Alexander Winn Jan 11 at 0:38

protected by PearsonArtPhoto Dec 16 '13 at 11:16

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.