Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Nobel-prize winning physicist Richard Feynman is given credit as inventing the concept of quantum computers in about 1982 in the paper "Simulating physics with computers." Also, recently the company DWave has introduced an allegedly real quantum computer that has seen a lot of news, including purchases by NASA, Google, and Lockheed Martin.

When was the concept of a quantum computer first used in science fiction?

share|improve this question
    
("early" occurrences ok also if answerers are not sure of a definitive "earliest" answer) –  vzn Mar 13 at 22:21
2  
Quarantine; 1994 - amazon.com/Quarantine-Greg-Egan/dp/0061054232 I'm sure others can do better –  Richard Mar 13 at 23:30
    
Did they ever mention what type of computer Ziggy was in Quantum Leap? –  Xantec Mar 14 at 19:10
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Quantum computing experts tend to say that DWave is not a "true" universal quantum computer which uses the quantum version of logic gates, rather it combines quantum physics with what's known as an "adiabatic computer", which does let it do certain types of calculations better than a classical computer though it's not clear whether this can be scaled up (see the Scientific American article here for a good summary).

As for your question, I tried searching "quantum computer" on google books, then when the list of results came up I clicked "search tools" at the top, then switched from "any time" to "custom range", and restricted the date range in various ways to try to find the earliest example of a sci-fi book with this phrase. Earliest I could find were the snippets here that showed up on pp. 155-159 of an issue of "Analog Science Fiction & Fact", a little searching for more snippets from the same story showed that it's the novelette "A Gift Before Leaving" by W.R. Thompson, from the Mid-December 1992 issue (see the two consecutive snippets on p. 159 here and here). That issue is available cheap from marketplace sellers on amazon, if you want to read it. Of course google books doesn't include all publications, but this is probably one of the earliest, anyway.

edit: Richard's answer of "Quarantine" by Greg Egan is a good find, the hardcover version was from September 1992 so it predates "A Gift Before Leaving" by a few months. If you click on the cover on its amazon page and do a search for "quantum computer", Egan never uses that specific phrase but there is a quote describing the idea on pp. 213-214: "Let a computer smear--with the right kind of quantum randomness--and you create, in effect, a 'parallel' machine with an astronomical number of processors. Each one executes the same program, but applies it to different data. All you have to do is be sure that when you collapse the system, you choose the version that happened to find the needle in the mathematical haystack."

I also came across a later essay by Egan where he explains that his idea in the story of what would be possible with a quantum computer was invalidated by later science:

That last part is where the dream collides with reality. There is no general-purpose method for instantly discovering which, if any, of the “branches” of the calculation yielded the desired result. All you have at the end of the calculation is a quantum system in a superposition of thousands of states, and if you simply measure the state of that system, the probability of observing the one result that tells you something useful is vanishingly small. You might just as well have run a single classical computer on a randomly chosen input! There are ingenious things that can be done for particular problems: approaches that exploit the detailed structure of the problem to enable a quantum computer to reach a state where it has a high probability of telling you something useful (Peter Shor's algorithm for factoring numbers is the most celebrated example of that). But what the 1997 “BBBV” paper showed was that the naive idea of taking a completely general problem and expecting a quantum computer to give the answer in the same manner, and just as rapidly, as if you were dealing with as many classical computers as there are branches to the quantum calculation, is untenable. I suppose I can’t be blamed for failing to know this result five years before it was proved, but this is fatal for most of Nick’s quantum feats, which amount to him “smearing”, simultaneously trying every alternative among thousands or millions, then choosing to collapse to the branch that happened to succeed.

share|improve this answer
    
agreed elite scientists are right now debating whether the Dwave computer actually/fully harnesses quantum effects (that whole debate is covered quite thoroughly in the link in the question) but it is unequivocally the 1st small-to-medium-scale computer designed to harness quantum effects. also, it would seem a bit surprising to me if the earliest uses of QM computers all postdate Feynman's conception, which in that case would mean a physicist/scientist seemed to have more imagination/vision than science fiction writers, where it is usually in many cases exactly the opposite case... –  vzn Mar 14 at 0:53
1  
@vzn: It's possible there could be examples that predate Feynman's conception, they presumably wouldn't use the specific phrase "quantum computer" so they'd be harder to find with google books. On the other hand, the idea that quantum superposition could be used to speed up certain computations is fairly technical, so I wouldn't really expect science fictions writers to have come up with an intuitive conception of it before the technical proposal, unlike with technologies whose basic idea would tend to naturally suggest themselves without the need for technical arguments, like nanotechnology. –  Hypnosifl Mar 14 at 1:09
    
agreed; however the point is that using wavefunctions for computing at all is a very unexpected/counterintuitive idea on 1st glance and was not seriously proposed until ~4 decades after the birth of QM around the turn of the 19th century. and scifi is replete with many cases of anticipating unexpected/counterintuitive technologies, the list is very long, & am looking how QM computing now fits into it (now that its basically a reality and literally not scifi anymore). –  vzn Mar 14 at 2:16
1  
I also found a pre-1982 sci fi book using the phrase "quantum computer", Bugs by Theodore Roszak from 1981, but Roszak meant something different by this phrase, on p. 237 a character says: "Wait until you read the stuff on the quantum computer--to be modeled, mind you, on the telekinetic capacities of the brain. It uses tachyons instead of electrons. Faster than the speed of light, understand?" (I guess it's possible Roszak had heard enough about QM to conflate the 'nonlocality' of entanglement with FTL tachyon communication, but he was probably just using 'quantum' as technobabble) –  Hypnosifl Mar 14 at 13:49
add comment

Isaac Asimov's "The Last Question" 1956. It describes the evolution of the supercomputer Multivac as it tries to answer the ultimate question during the ages. The mechanics of the computer gets to the atomic level IIRC and beyond into hyperspace by the end.

share|improve this answer
    
Asimov does describe "Microvac" as having "molecular valves" in place of transistors, so its parts are on a quantum scale in size, but he wasn't thinking specifically that it was using quantum physics to make its computations more efficient, and without that it wouldn't be a true "quantum computer" in the modern sense of the word. –  Hypnosifl Mar 14 at 0:45
    
have to look at this in detail, but agree that "valves" is a classical concept of computing that can be done at a very small scale. eg this maybe is more an example of small scale circuits/nanotechnology used in a story. the essence(?) of a QM computer is that it uses nonclassical waves/entanglement for computing aka "spintronics". –  vzn Mar 14 at 0:57
add comment

There was a James Hogan book in 1996, Paths to Otherwhere. As memory serves, it's explained that rather than relying on binary, the computer relied on the quantum numbers instead. Whether this was meant as a simplified explanation for a quantum computer, I don't know.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.