Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

enter image description here

Is there in the books or on Tolkien's letters a description of Sauron's armor during the first or third age, when he was not trying to "seduce" other races?

Is it accurately portrayed in the movies?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 19 down vote accepted

There's no description of Sauron's armour in the books - in fact, there's no indication that he even wore any.

The most full description of Sauron is in Letter 246, and reads as follows:

Sauron should be thought of as very terrible. The form that he took was that of a man of more than human stature, but not gigantic. In his earlier incarnation he was able to veil his power (as Gandalf did) and could appear as a commanding figure of great strength of body and supremely royal demeanour and countenance.

In the First Age, he wasn't an armoured giant but rather a sorceror, a wizard, a necromancer, even, and is described as such in the Silmarillion:

Sauron was become now a sorcerer of dreadful power, master of shadows and of phantoms, foul in wisdom, cruel in strength, misshaping what he touched, twisting what he ruled, lord of werewolves; his dominion was torment.

The depiction of him in the movies is an invention so treat it as fan-fiction. In general Tolkien himself doesn't go into this kind of specific detail with many of his characters.

share|improve this answer
While your point about the difference between the movies and Tolkien's writing is a good one, calling the former "fan-fiction" is a bridge too far. –  DougM Mar 14 '14 at 14:28
@DougM - Actually I do call it "fan fiction" because the movie depiction is based on a popular depiction in many fan drawings, which in turn probably comes from John Howe's paintings of Morgoth; e.g john-howe.com/portfolio/gallery/data/media/55/… –  user8719 Mar 14 '14 at 15:38
@GustavoMP: it's, at worst, "second-class canon." The movies are at least as official as anything Chris Tolkien slapped together. –  DougM Mar 14 '14 at 16:08
@DougM - what you're calling "anything Chris Tolkien slapped together" was in actual fact and for a quite large part written by JRRT with the explicit intent of publication. Plus JRRT's will granted CT rights to do whatever he wished with any unpublished works, including rewrite them as he saw fit. –  user8719 Mar 14 '14 at 16:22
@DougM - one was explicitly authorized by JRRT and had his blessing, the other didn't. You may argue that the movies were licensed, but I'd encourage you to read JRRT's letters about the Zimmerman script to see his opinion of a certain kind of changes. –  user8719 Mar 14 '14 at 16:42

There's an entry on Sauron's appearance at http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/faq/sauronshape.html with a lot of quotes from Tolkien's writing, seems like a well-researched site so I doubt they missed any detailed descriptions...from this, it seems Tolkien was never too specific in his description of what Sauron looked like, and said nothing about what he wore. But in support of his general appearance as a very tall humanlike being, there's this quote: "Sauron should be thought of as very terrible. The form that he took was that of a man of more than human stature, but not gigantic."

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.