Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I remember in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, a wizard was reading A Brief History of Time by the author Stephen Hawking.
a

Why should a wizard read something like this? And was there any specific reason as to why this book only was chosen?

share|improve this question
5  
Movies aren't really canon likely just there to aid the Ian Brown cameo. If it mentioned in the books "Harry saw a wizard read a brief history of time" this would be an entirely different question, but alas it did not. –  Simon Mar 27 at 13:53
1  
I'm positive this has been asked about before, but I can't find it on the site. Maybe it was in comments or the previous question was deleted. –  Anthony Grist Mar 27 at 14:01
2  
So that the next person can find the question more easily, could you please mention "Stephen Hawking" in the question text? –  b_jonas Mar 27 at 14:49
3  
The HP wiki suggests that it foreshadows time travel later in the film, that's about the only thing I've found related. –  JohnP Mar 27 at 15:07
4  
Why shouldn't a wizard read it? It's a good book! :P (Slightly more seriously, we do have wizards interested in what muggles come up with, such as Mr. Weasley. It's not unthinkable that there would be a wizard with more advanced interest in muggle discoveries beyond toaster ovens.) –  Brian S Mar 27 at 15:36
show 8 more comments

2 Answers 2

up vote 13 down vote accepted

There's no reason a wizard wouldn't read such a book. I'm sure there are some minority of wizards who want to understand the 'Muggle World' and Stephen Hawking's books that are aimed at the layperson (such as A Brief History of Time) are actually fairly good. They explain things simply, so that an average person can understand, and give a nice entry to the concepts. It would be a nice way for a wizard to begin to get the gist of where Muggle knowledge is.

Such a book might be recommended to someone who entered a bookstore in search of 'science books' or to someone who read a Muggle newspaper and discovered the names of some top scientists.

Alternatively, it could be somewhat popular in the Wizard world at large:

A wizard would likely find Hawking to be amusing - 'physics' and 'material limits' just don't apply to them. To a wizard who knows about time turners, Hawking's assertations about the impossibility of time travel would be laughable. Even to those without, many concepts of modern physics (such as conservation of momentum and the concept that matter can't be created or destroyed) would seem silly.

Since such things are presented with all seriousness by Muggle physics, the end result for a wizard might be taken as extremely deadpan humor.

share|improve this answer
    
Good, I thought magic and science don't go together (Don't you think so?). That was the reason I asked this. Anyways, thanks for your answer... –  Awal Garg Mar 27 at 16:16
2  
@AwalGarg: I don't think they go together at all, really. Around magic in Harry Potter, technology doesn't work very well. Essentially, I believe that physics just goes and cries when people start casting spells, and science & technology need physics to remain stable. –  Jeff Mar 27 at 16:24
    
Good, marking it as solved. –  Awal Garg Mar 27 at 16:26
    
@AwalGarg I disagree - Snape says in Order of the Phoenix something like: "Space and time matter", when Snape is teaching Harry Occlumency. –  Mooz Mar 28 at 0:37
    
@BorhanMooz By that, Snape meant the space around and inside your brain, and time, in the magical world, has its own science. Like the time turner and other such things, they all work on principles, which are logical to the witches, means, magic is their only science. They don't agree with our science. –  Awal Garg Mar 28 at 7:33
add comment

Most people read for the following reasons:

  • They enjoy reading. Many people enjoy reading on a wide variety of topics. I imagine this would be true in the Wizarding World (Hermione is a perfect example -- the wizard in your picture might be Muggleborn, thus have interests in both the wizarding and Muggle worlds.).
  • It's required reading for a class, such as Muggle Studies.
  • It's the current selection for a wizarding Book-of-the-Month Club.
  • It's required reading for wizard-Muggle liaison work.
  • Other

Finally, Stephen Hawking's A Brief History of Time just might be a bit of a more fascinating read than the following wizarding books:

  • Alas, I Have Transfigured My Feet (Hélas, Je me suis Transfiguré mes Pieds) by Malecrit
  • Broken Balls: When Fortunes Turn Foul (Author Unknown)
  • Encyclopedia of Toadstools (Author Unknown)
  • Hairy Snout, Human Heart by an anonymous werewolf
  • Charm Your Own Cheese by Gerda Curd
  • Muggles Who Notice by Blenheim Stalk
  • The Philosophy of the Mundane: Why Muggles Prefer Not to Know by Professor Mordicus Egg
  • Who Am I? by Gilderoy Lockhart
  • Sonnets of a Sorcerer (Everyone who read this cursed book spoke in limericks for the rest of their lives. Author unknown.)
share|improve this answer
    
Given a choice, I'd sit with Kreacher listening to Professor Binns reading out a copy of "Common Magical Ailments and Afflictions", rather than even glance at a Gilderoy Lockhart book. #bleauch –  The Dragon Rider who Lived Mar 30 at 7:12
    
@TheDragonRiderwhoLived -- I'm with you! Well, okay, I might be persuaded to crack open Who Am I? purely for the schadenfreude factor. But, then again, it probably wouldn't be nice for me to point and laugh at a man in curlers, debilitated by his own ineptitude ;) ;) ;) –  Slytherincess Jun 5 at 20:36
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.