Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I saw the question about the landing gear on the Enterprise from TOS (Did the Original Enterprise Have Landing Gear?) and it made me wonder: are all (or any) of the Constitution/Galaxy class starships capable of landing? e.g. If they have lost all of their shuttles and the magnetic field around the planet won't allow transportation. I mean some standard procedure, not an extreme landing like it was in ST: Generations.

share|improve this question
    
The landing structures in both are to help with crash-landing, not landing –  Richard Apr 27 at 7:56

3 Answers 3

up vote 7 down vote accepted

No, neither the Constitution Class starship, nor the Galaxy Class starship are designed to land, except in extreme circumstances where a landing would be characterised as a catastrophic crash-landing.

Constitution Class Emergency procedures;

The best semi-canon "emergency landing procedures" for the Constitution-class Starship are detailed in "Mr Scott's Guide to the Enterprise".

Landing Struts

The implication is that the nacelles are explosively ejected. The ship then extends "Emergency Landing Legs" that will be used stabilise the saucer section on landing. The saucer would either be abandoned, destroyed or taken back into space by another Federation vessel depending on the potential for violating the Prime Directive.

Galaxy Class Emergency Procedures;

These can be found in the canon sourcebook; "The TNG Technical Manual";

Emergency Landing TNG

Again, the nacelles would be separated (in this case using the "Saucer Separation sequence") and the saucer would then use a mixture of shields and structural fields to prevent its occupants from suffering severe injuries on impact.

This sequence, originally planned for the series but shelved due to the extreme cost was ultimately seen in the film 'Generations';

Other sources;

In the non-canon Trek book "Rogue Saucer", the Enterprise is outfitted with new (experimental) saucer section that can supposedly survive a landing;

“I’m glad to hear you say that, Captain.” Admiral Nechayev leaned across the table and stared at him with cold, hazel eyes. “You wanted a chance to redeem yourself? Starfleet is not pleased by the fact that emergency-landing a saucer section badly damages it in every scenario we’ve tested. So we’ve built a prototype saucer section with improved forcefields and dampening fields, in the hope that it can survive atmospheric reentry, land, and be relaunched.

“The prototype has special thrusters that can lift it into the atmosphere, where a tractor beam from an orbiting ship can pull it into orbit. Theoretically, the hull section could resurrect its own saucer section from the planet’s surface. If this proves successful, we won’t risk leaving all that valuable technology behind for indigenous people to dig up.”

Suffice to say, it's unsuccessful.

share|improve this answer
2  
Those inertia dampeners will never seize to surprise me in their selectiveness. A ship can accelerate to full impulse (maybe some 200000 km/s) without anyone feeling anything. It hits a rock, slowing it down by maybe 20 kph and all of the crew is tossed around like dominos. Fascinating! –  Einer Apr 27 at 10:41
2  
@Einer - I'd guess it's a matter of predictability. When the ship is accelerating, the control systems could easily feed into the inertial dampeners to give them warning of what's about to happen. But a rapid/unexpected change (as in an impact or an emergency maneuver at the limits of capability of the ship) would make it harder for them to react quickly enough. –  Jules Apr 27 at 13:06
    
@Jules: I always imagined that it was impact/energy damage that caused the inertial dampers and gravity plating to momentarily malfunction. The ship is protected from massive accelerations, but if it slams into rock or gets hit with phasers, it's still going to take damage in those areas, which could manifest symptoms in any of the computerized systems, including intertial dampers. –  Lèse majesté Apr 27 at 15:01

Not that I've ever heard. Voyager was one of the few if not the only one that had the capability to land.

I've never read that any others could land as they were generally too big and simply never designed to land on a planet. That is why they had the transporters, shuttles, etc.

The Constitution class ships could separate the saucer section from the warp drive as Kirk even mentioned in a original episode. In theory it's possible that the saucer section could possibly land on a planet.. but not while it's in it's normal, all together configuration.

share|improve this answer

The saucer sections of the Constitution and Galaxy class ships could land, but not the main body. There are a couple of books (one was Enterprise, can't recall the other) where the saucer section of the Enterprise (1701) was detached and landed on the Earth for the purposes of a refit. The reason was described that workers could work much faster in a full gravity environment.

The Galaxy class ships were listed as having the saucer section capable of landing in one of the technical manuals.

share|improve this answer
    
Land or crash land? I don't recall ever seeing landing struts/gear on the saucer section of either class. –  Lèse majesté Apr 27 at 6:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.