Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

During the film V for Vendetta, the character Delia Surridge recounts her experiences at Larkhill in her journal. She describes V developing abnormal abilities and kinesthesia, and when encountering V while the facility is burning to the ground, writes "...he looked at me, not with eyes - there were no eyes - but I know he was looking at me because I felt it."

Was V physically blind as a result of the experiments performed on him at Larkhill (or perhaps due to the fire), but somehow he compensated with his other heightened senses?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
Off topic because it is Not SciFi –  DVK May 4 '14 at 6:06
@dvk - There were certainly elements of sci-fi in the comic including an artificial intelligence –  Richard May 4 '14 at 6:23
@DVK A dystopian future history whose anti-hero is given advanced strength, reflexes, endurance and pain tolerance via cruel medical experiments sounds like sci-fi to me. –  BESW May 4 '14 at 7:23
And I was hoping there was evidence that V used some sort of sixth sense (which would definitely be a sci-fi element) to picture the environment around him. –  RobertF May 4 '14 at 13:28

1 Answer 1

No, he isn't blind in either the film or the source comic.

Ignoring the more obvious elements (fight scenes, throwing of knives, etc) there are at least two occasions where he performs acts that would be impossible without sight:

When he lacerates the poster: enter image description here

Cooking for Evey (where he flips and then catches a piece of bread in the pan) enter image description here

In the comicbook, a line in Dr Delia's diary makes it clear that he can still see at the time of his escape;

"He looked at me. As if I were an insect. Oh God. As if I were something mounted on a slide."

share|improve this answer
Although in the film, Delia specifically states "...he looked at me, not with eyes - there were no eyes - but I know he was looking at me because I felt it." –  RobertF May 4 '14 at 14:45
@RobertF - "There were no eyes" could easily be read as "I couldn't see his eyes" since his back was to a bright fire... –  Richard May 4 '14 at 14:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.