Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Towards the end of Deathly Hallows, when Harry goes to BigV in the forest, we see Hagrid tied to a tree on the edge of the clearing. They even use silencing charms on him to shut him up.

Voldemort killed his own people for hearing about the cup or just being annoying, yet spares one of Harry's closest friends?

Why would they keep him alive?

What possible use could he be to them? A lure for Harry? Keeping the beasts of the forests at bay perhaps?

Given what we know of Riddle, I would expect him to order the Death Eaters to "kill Potter's friends, the more the better" and not take hostages!

share|improve this question
Probably a mix of intimidation tactics (“we subdued the half-giant; aren’t we impressive”), making this extra painful for Harry (by the time he sees Hagrid, fleeing is impossible), or perhaps related to the more personal history Hagrid and Voldemort have together. – alexwlchan May 22 '14 at 23:53
Good points, I've often wondered if Voldemort would remember Hagrid. Diary-Riddle seemed to. – Luke Turner May 23 '14 at 0:09
Who would have carried Harry's corpse in the end? – Evil Angel May 24 '14 at 10:28

I suspect there may not be any canon answer to this. But here goes my take...


As a Witness
It is most likely that Voldemort was making sure that there was a non-Death Eater witness on hand to relay the death of Harry Potter and the circumstances surrounding the death to Harry's supporters.

Psychological Warfare
Another point as mentioned by DVK is to add an element of psychological damage to his enemies.

Voldemort truly believed in defeating his enemies, not only by physical means, but also using psychological means:

[Voldemort]: no man alive can threaten me now! Watch! Crucio!”

Harry had been expecting it, knew his body would not be allowed to remain unsullied upon the forest floor; it must be subjected to humiliation to prove Voldemort’s victory.
-Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter Thirty-Six (The Flaw in the Plan).

Hagrid is impeccably strong, as well as a fierce and unrelenting member of the Order of the Phoenix. The message of "look, we've got your fiercest warrior and he is nothing but a puppet to us now!" is surely to strike despair into the hearts of his enemies; as we can see has happened to Prof. McGonagall:

... “NO!”

The scream was the more terrible because he had never expected or dreamed that Professor McGonagall could make such a sound. He heard another woman laughing nearby, and knew that Bellatrix gloried in McGonagall’s despair. ...
-Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter Thirty-Six (The Flaw in the Plan).

Note that Voldemort was definitely not expecting to capture Hagrid and use him in this way, but he saw the opportunity present itself and used it to his advantage. As we see that he (Voldemort) was originally thinking of dragging Harry's body back to the survivors, but changes his mind when he realises that using Hagrid would have a greater impact:

“Now,” said Voldemort, “we go to the castle, and show them what has become of their hero. Who shall drag the body?

No — Wait —”

There was a fresh outbreak of laughter, and after a few moments Harry felt the ground trembling beneath him.

“You carry him,” Voldemort said. “He will be nice and visible in your arms, will he not? Pick up your little friend, Hagrid. And the glasses — put on the glasses — he must be recognizable —”
-Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter Thirty-Six (The Flaw in the Plan).

Kill With Meaning
You are incorrect in your assumption; Voldemort doesn't just kill for fun, or for no-good-reason at all.

He is extremely meticulous and cunning, and knows when to kill as well as when not to kill, as I've pointed out here:

One simple movement and the child would never reach his mother . . . but unnecessary, quite unnecessary. . . .
-Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows, Chapter Seventeen (Bathilda's Secret).

Voldemort does not just want to annihilate the entire world along with the whole wizarding population. He is especially against the spilling of "pure-blood", but also knows that he must 'rule not kill':

“The battle is won. You have lost half of your fighters. My Death Eaters outnumber you, and the Boy Who Lived is finished. There must be no more war. Anyone who continues to resist, man, woman, or child, will be slaughtered, as will every member of their family. Come out of the castle now, kneel before me, and you shall be spared. Your parents and children, your brothers and sisters will live and be forgiven, and you will join me in the new world we shall build together.”
-Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Chapter Thirty-Six (The Flaw in the Plan).


Right in the feels
JKR seems to be very fond of symbolism in her story. When we first meet Harry as a baby, he is carried in by (non-other than) Hagrid himself! and now Hagrid has to carry Harry's (apparently) dead body back to the throngs of onlookers.
(It truly made my heart melt when I read that part)

share|improve this answer

There's no canon info for what Voldemort was thinking; but it's possible it was for psychological value. (same as showing defeated and dead Potter to Hogwarts defenders). It'd be too much work to carry a dead Hagrid all the way out of the forest.

share|improve this answer
Very much the style of Voldemort/Tom Riddle – Mooz May 23 '14 at 10:30
+1 for It'd be too much work to carry a dead Hagrid all the way out of the forest. – Awal Garg May 24 '14 at 0:33
I wonder … the extra protection against magic that Hagrid, as a half-giant, enjoys—is that tied to his physical body, or his soul? If Voldemort did manage to kill him with Avada Kedavra (presumably not easy, but should be just about manageable if you’re Voldemort), would Hagrid still be a lot of work to mobilicorpus back to the school? Or would a dead Hagrid be as easy to float along as any other 1,000 lb object? – Janus Bahs Jacquet Apr 22 '15 at 12:21
@JanusBahsJacquet - physical body. Skin, as far as I recall. – DVK-in-exile Apr 22 '15 at 16:34
But of course it's not obvious whether such a resistance would apply at all for something like mobilicorpus: having thick skin will make it harder to cut you up, but not to tie you up, as a parallel. Hmmm… – Janus Bahs Jacquet Apr 22 '15 at 16:36

First, Hagrid is perceived as a blundering fool by Voldemort (recalling the time of Tom Riddle and Hagrid in Hogwarts), therefore, considers the half-giant not dangerous. The Dark Lord renders Hagrid immobile to avoid any complications.

Second, Hagrid is very close to Harry. The inflicted pain would be psychologically most debilitating if Hagrid can be used as a pawn in the transaction of Harry. Finally, Hagrid is a half-giant. Giants were a part of the Dark army. There may be some considerations involved here.

In conclusion, I think Hagrid is not killed by Voldemort on account of its sheer irrelevance to the big plans of Voldemort.

share|improve this answer

Because, well, JKR just wasn't up for it.

share|improve this answer
JKR is not GRRM, so some characters get to stay alive. – Rob May 23 '14 at 3:37
@Rob: I don't know, the last book is soaked in death IMO. – Voldemort May 23 '14 at 6:18
@Voldemort: Well, that was kinda your fault... – Andrew Martin May 23 '14 at 11:12
I think this is the most correct answer. – Jim Thio Jun 20 '14 at 4:58

The killing curse is expensive in terms of mana per pound of mass, plus a giant's magical permeability is at least two orders of magnitude greater than normal, so we can expect a half-giant's to be somewhere in the middle. Now, Voldemort does not need to do the calculations in his head to see that he needs to save his energy in this case.

JK doesn't mention all the technical details for good reasons, it might come in handy when Harry goes to the University of Magic in Bulgaria.

share|improve this answer
Can you provide some references for these statements? – Shevliaskovic May 24 '14 at 10:29
It's apparent from careful reading of the books. – Evgeni Sergeev May 24 '14 at 11:35

protected by Community May 24 '14 at 14:13

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.