Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Has Neil Stephenson ever commented about how the character's name Da5id should be pronounced?

Failing that how is the name pronounced in the audio version?

I'm re-reading the book and my inner voice is confused...

share|improve this question
Since 5 is V in a Roman numerals, I'm guessing, "David"? – Wikis May 27 '14 at 18:42
Holy shite! How did I not think of that? @Wikis – Motti May 27 '14 at 18:44
Thanks, well it is just a guess but, since it seems to make sense and has a couple of upvotes, I'll add it as an answer rather than just a comment. – Wikis May 27 '14 at 18:58
Since 5 is spelled with an 'F', his name would be pronounced 'Dafid' rather than 'David'. – Morgan May 27 '14 at 19:09
Since Dafydd is a Welsh name, and "f" in Welsh is pronounced like "v" in English, then it would still be pronounced "David" if the "5" stood for "f". – Mike Scott May 27 '14 at 19:23
up vote 29 down vote accepted

In the audiobook below, the consistent pronunciation is David ('deɪ-vɪd').

Obviously the choice of a l33t name (e.g. replacing one or more characters for a number) is intended to identify him to the reader as a hacker/cracker both in and out-of-universe.

In this case, the letter v (which corresponds with the Roman numeral V) has been replaced with the number 5.

share|improve this answer
@DVK This was written before annoying crap like "133t" and all that crap. It's brilliant. – Meat Trademark May 28 '14 at 1:04
It's 1337, not 133t, you noobs :) – Sergio Tulentsev May 28 '14 at 13:51
@Richard: What the heck does "appears superficially similar to" mean? Only the most pedantic would argue that "the Roman numeral V" is not a letter V, and I'm pretty sure no Romans would have argued that way. Sure, the concept of five is different than the numeral 5 or V, but in script form, which is what we are discussing, the Roman numeral for five is a letter V. – ThePopMachine May 28 '14 at 14:41
@thepopmachine - it's not pedantry, it's accuracy. The roman number V is not the same as the letter v. They don't share a common root – Valorum May 28 '14 at 15:43
@Richard: Wikipedia: Roman numerals, the numeric system used in ancient Rome, employs combinations of letters from the Latin alphabet to signify values. – ThePopMachine May 28 '14 at 16:35

Disclaimer: I haven't read the books so this is just a guess.

Since 5 is V in Roman numerals, I'm guessing "David".

share|improve this answer
I don't recall it ever being explicitly stated in the book, but this is how I've always pronounced it in my head. – phantom42 May 27 '14 at 19:00
This isn't an answer, it's speculation from someone who's admittedly not even read the material in question -- at best it qualifies as a comment (and, in fact, you did make it a comment -- why then turn what's clearly not up to snuff for a full-fledged answer into one?). It's good as a comment, but completely unsuitable as an answer. – Kromey May 27 '14 at 19:36
@Kromey: I don't see any reason not to speculate in an answer as long as it is not wild speculation. This happens here all the time! It's fine as long as it is explained and as long as it is clear that it is only speculation. As to why I made it an answer, see my comment above. – Wikis May 27 '14 at 20:04
@Kromey: no worries, you have nothing to apologise for. But I don't think there is a difference between speculation and guessing. We will have to agree to differ. – Wikis May 27 '14 at 20:17
@Wikis Like I said in my last comment, I erred in expressing myself correctly initially. – Kromey May 28 '14 at 14:09

There's another (though highly unlikely) possibility. To be able to send text (SMS) messages on phones that were not Arabic enabled, Arab teenagers created a system using the Roman alphabet and the numbers 3,5,7 and 9 to represent sounds not found in English.

'5' is, more or less, an aspirated 'h' sound.

The beauty of their system is that you can write Arabic perfectly well in it, and from left to right as well.

But I doubt that Stephenson had this in mind.

share|improve this answer
This is interesting but largely irrelevant to the question asked. At most it should have been a comment. – Valorum May 28 '14 at 16:53
Yech. I hate Arabeezy even more than 733t. – System Down May 28 '14 at 16:56
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. – System Down May 28 '14 at 16:56
Sure it does; it suggests that another pronunciation is treating the 5 as a hard "h" or Spanish "jota" sound. How is this not answering the question? – user26732 May 29 '14 at 16:25
@user26732 - Well, firstly because there's no canon reason to assume that Stephenson knew anything about this piece of SMS esoterica – Valorum Jun 1 '14 at 6:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.