Sign up ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry almost all students have their own pets like owls, cats, toads, etc. I understand that students need owls for communication, but is it necessary that all the students must have a pet of their own?

share|improve this question
Witches, Familiars, yea, that's probably just something a muggle like you wouldn't grok. –  user16696 Jun 26 '14 at 4:56
So Kevin outed himself as a muggle. I thought you were one of us : ( –  Meat Trademark Jun 26 '14 at 5:18
@cde They wouldn't grep your sentence either... ;) –  Tobias Wärre Jun 26 '14 at 5:30
@MeatTrademark i dont like to be a muggle either –  Kevin The Knight Jun 26 '14 at 5:35
"Almost all"? As far as I can remember, 50% of the Gryffindors in Harry's year are never mentioned as having pets (Parvati, Lavender, Dean and Seamus), and Hermione only got hers in their third year. Fred and George are never mentioned as having pets, Ginny didn't get one until her fifth (Harry's sixth and last) year at Hogwarts. Not anywhere near as much detail on the other Houses, though we know Cho Chang didn't own an owl (though may have had a cat, I doubt she'd have a toad). –  Anthony Grist Jun 26 '14 at 9:05

3 Answers 3

up vote 26 down vote accepted


The exact wording in the Hogwarts letter is

Students may also bring an owl OR a cat OR a toad

Philosopher’s Stone, chapter 5, Diagon Alley

Note “may”, not “must”. For example, Hermione doesn’t have a pet until the third year.

Most students also won’t have their own owl. The school owlery has a set of owls that anybody can use for post, or there’s the post office in Hogsmeade which is accessible to the older students.

share|improve this answer
"Students may also bring an owl OR a cat OR a toad" - Ron takes a rat. Typical Ron. –  Dr R Dizzle Jun 26 '14 at 7:38
And at the end of the movie, you see one of the kids carry around a ferret in a cage. They likely get to do this because of the leverage one of the kid's parents has on the school. –  Thomas Jacobs Jun 26 '14 at 8:16
@DrRDizzle: Why was Ron Weasley permitted to bring a rat to Hogwarts? –  b_jonas Jun 26 '14 at 8:20
Great question, @b_jonas. –  Thebluefish Jun 26 '14 at 15:36
@ThomasJacobs - they likely get to do this because of moviemakers playing loose and fast with canon. Fixed that for you. –  DVK Jun 26 '14 at 20:39

The students aren't required to bring their own pets, its a luxury. The pets of Hogwarts function mostly as animal companions and sources of comfort to students who are spending a large portion of the year seperated from their families. Cats, toads and owls are the traditional pets, but some students got away with bringing other pets, as long as they weren't big or dangerous.

Dumbledore was exceptionally unique in his bond with Fawkes was a rare sort of bond.

Ron got away with bringing Scabbers because the Weasley line was well know for having "more children than they could feed" and being very poor. A rat was probably one of the cheapest pets that can be bought in the wizarding world. Scabbers was relatively small and harmless. I'm sure he'd have preferred a new owl over Hermes, who was very old and losing his vision so was always crashing into things, but his family couldn't afford a new owl. He was awestruck when Sirius Black purchased a new owl for him after the events in Prisoner of Azkaban.

Crookshanks wasn't a pure 'cat' as he was a hybrid of cat/kneazle.

Hagrid's 'personal' pet was a large black dog, which is excluding every other animal he though of as 'his' that were cared for on the Hogwarts grounds.

Most people forget Ginny's pet was a pygmy puff. Ron also owned the pygmy puff's predecessor the puffskein briefly, until it supposedly died after being mistaken for a ball and used during bludger practice.

I'm sure depending on the pet in question they'd be allowed outside of the traditional three as long as there weren't safety hazards relating to it. Like pet tarantulas, weasels, some other type of small to medium bird species, herbology prodigies may prefer potted carnivorous plants over mammals, or even keep a gold fish. I highly doubt anyone would think it was unusual if a slytherin favored a serpent pet - much like the Slytherin founder - as long as it wasn't aggressive or poisonous and didn't grown large during the student's time at Hogwarts. What is mostly taken into consideration is practicality, maintenance, and portability.

All in all, giving how some students skipped years before getting pet, its easy to determine pets were just a luxury and not mandatory.

share|improve this answer

I would guess no, because Hermione does not have a pet in the first two years.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.