Take the 2-minute tour ×
Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for science fiction and fantasy enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Legolas is the son of Thranduil, the King of the Elves of Northern Mirkwood. He is also a member of The Fellowship of the Ring in The Lord of the Rings. Legolas also appeared in the films of The Hobbit. Does he appear in the book The Hobbit?

share|improve this question

5 Answers 5

up vote 43 down vote accepted

No, Legolas does not appear in the original text of the Hobbit, even though Thorin's company does go through Mirkwood and meet the Wood-Elves and their king.

In fact, the King isn't even named in the book, not to mention any sons he might have, and the description of the Wood-Elves is a far cry from that of the Elves in the Lord of the Rings - wild and dangerous and fond of wine. Their king isn't even given a name - he's just the Elf King. It's clear that he didn't really have the whole backstory of the Elves in mind when he wrote them - The Hobbit wasn't even originally planned to be part of the Legendarium of the Lord of the Rings and the Silmarillion, it just merged into it later.

share|improve this answer
1  
Wild and dangerous? I wouldn't have summarised it that harshly. Are you referring to the pre-retcon Hobbit (which I haven't read)? –  leftaroundabout Jul 3 at 11:09
5  
From Chapter 8: "They differed from the High Elves of the West, and were more dangerous and less wise." –  Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jul 3 at 11:14
7  
As I understand it, there are three classes of elves. The high elves (Lothlorien, the Grey Havens), the middle-class elves (Rivendell), and the embarrassing no-class country-cousin elves of Mirkwood. –  Joe L. Jul 3 at 12:35
13  
It's a bit more complicated than that, with the division between Moriquendi and Calaquendi, but also the intermingling between the Noldor of Valinor and the Teleri of Beleriand, but that's a whole different question right there. –  Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jul 3 at 14:25
1  
These are all good questions, and they should be asked as questions. Comments are transient and will eventually disappear. –  Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jul 4 at 8:20

He does not explicitly appear, as the other answers here note, but in not mentioning his name it is also not made explicit that Legolas is not in Mirkwood when Bilbo and the Dwarves make their way through. In fact, as Peter Jackson noted by putting him into The Desolation of Smaug, his apparent age and forest of origin make it clear that he certainly could have been one of the elves the Hobbits ran into during their adventures (or misadventures) in the forest. As Jimmy Shelter has pointed out, there is no familiar interaction between Gloin and Legolas at the Council of Elrond, but this could easily be chalked up to the old Dwarven-Elven feud (although, of course, the real-world reason is that Legolas had not been invented when The Hobbit was written).

What is revealed in the Tolkien Legendarium is:

  • Legolas was the son of Thranduil Greenleaf, the Elvenking of Mirkwood (formerly Greenwood)
  • The Mirkwood Elves were becoming increasingly withdrawn and xenophobic in the Third Age, making it very likely that the son of the Elvenking would have been among their number when the Dwarves' company entered the Elvenking's halls
  • Elves did not reach maturity until near their hundredth year, meaning that Legolas' adventures with the Fellowship must have happened after his first century of life. Counting back to Bilbo's journey with the Dwarves, Legolas was (at the youngest) in his mid to late twenties during those events, and probably far older (the film producers claim he was 2,931 years old during the adventures of the Fellowship, but that has no basis in the book's canon. More telling is, as Paul Griffiths notes, he says he "feel[s] young again" when venturing through Fangorn after the Fellowship fragments).

So clearly, it is possible (and maybe even likely) that the Dwarven Company met Legolas, though the book never mentions this meeting.

Tauriel, on the other hand, was invented entirely for the film adaptation.

share|improve this answer
    
Legolas certainly seems to be a less experienced ranger than Aragorn, suggesting he didn't leave Mirkwood much and/or was quite young when he participated in the Fellowship. –  La-comadreja Jul 3 at 14:39
5  
Legolas is not particularly young. In Fangorn, he says of the wood: "'It is old, very old,' said the Elf. 'So old that almost I feel young again, as I have not felt since I journeyed with you children.'" –  Paul Griffiths Jul 3 at 15:24
2  
It actually seems from the Council of Elrond, and the lack of interaction between Legolas and Gloin (aside from a single spoken line), that the company almost certainly did not meet him during their time in Thranduils halls. –  Darth Satan Jul 4 at 23:38
1  
@La-comadreja - Seems to be, perhaps, but as Paul Griffiths says, he alludes to being old in Fangorn. Added that to my answer, along with Jimmy Shelter's reminder that Legolas and Gloin don't seem to know one another (though I think it's far from "almost certain" from that one fact). –  ilinamorato Jul 6 at 4:04
1  
@Avner Shahar-Kashtan - There are a lot of things in the Legendarium that are intended to be inferred, though they aren't explicitly said. This is the case in all literature. We may infer that a pony has hair, though Bill's goes unmentioned. –  ilinamorato Jul 6 at 4:05

No, that was added for the movie. They may have seen or even met him, but this was never mentioned in the books, let alone by name.

If you search The Hobbit for Legolas (which is easily done on Google Books), you will not find that word.

share|improve this answer
1  
"made up" I think is a bit strong language; if you consider the revised version, as it fits in the universe of the LoTR, the dwarves met with Thranduil, father of Legolas. Considering the timeline and the longevity of elves, it is entirely plausible that they could have met or at the very least seen Legolas, even if that part wasn't included in the story. tl;dr it's easily arguable that he existed, and just didn't appear in the story. –  TylerH Jul 3 at 16:04
    
@TylerH made up does not imply implausible. Yes it is plausible (for once) but it was also made up for the movie since it was not the case in the book. Unlike, say, a human tossing a dwarf in full armor 4 meters or so with one hand! That was both made up for the movies and implausible :). –  terdon Jul 3 at 18:35
    
@terdon That's true. I didn't mean implausible, though, only that SQB's terminology made it sound a little like it wasn't at all possible to exist in the book through speculation. Agreed about the dwarf-tossing, bit. That was ridiculous. –  TylerH Jul 3 at 18:38
    
@terdon I think there should be a distinction between "liberal interpretation" and "made up". I would Tauriel made up, and Legolas a liberal intrepration. Surely there were female elves, but never one recorded named Tauriel or recorded as head of the guard, while Legolas has a deep backstory and would not be a surprise in any situation that also involved his father. –  corsiKa Jul 4 at 17:35

No, Legolas does not make an appearance in the novel, though Thorin and company are captured by Wood-Elves.

None of the elves are named explicitly in the novel; even the king is simply referred to as "The King" or like variations.

Much of the movies deviate from the original story line. For example, in An Unexpected Journey, the rock giants were added in simply for more action. They never appear in the book. Nor do the orcs; there are goblins, briefly, but they don't chase the dwarves and hobbit like in the movie.

share|improve this answer
3  
"[A]cross the valley the stone-giants were out, and were hurling rocks at one another for a game, and catching them, and tossing them down into the darkness where they smashed among the trees far below, or splintered into little bits with a bang ... they could hear the giants guffawing and shouting all over the mountainsides." The Hobbit, Chapter IV: "Over Hill And Under Hill" –  user29075 Jul 6 at 6:55
    
Oops. I guess I just missed that part... –  Dragona13 Jul 6 at 18:25

This subject causes alot of confusion between the bookies and the filmies. Seeing as the books were written by Tolkien himself we should use only the books for reference. There is no mention of Legolas in the Hobbit.
The Elf Legolas Greenleaf is actually first mentioned in The Fall of Gondolin although we can't be too sure if this is actually the same Legolas. When Legolas first realizes he is about to face Durin's Bane in Moria he clearly loses his cool. While all elves hated balrogs if Legolas was at Gondolin he would have witnessed the deaths of Ecthelion and Glorfindel not to mention the general devastation wreaked by the balrogs. This example of genealogy suggests that he is of the Gondolindrim but not if he is Noldorin. Being the son of Thranduil means he would be Silvan. After giving this great thought, I have come to the conclusion that the two elves are most definitely two separate elves. The Legolas of Gondolin was of the House of The Tree and members of that house fought with heavy spiked clubs and slings as opposed to the marksman skills so noteworthy during the War of the Ring. He lead the survivors out of the Ecoriath and was a known scout with excellent sight and hearing. These skills I feel would be inherent to all elves rather than to only Legolas.

share|improve this answer
1  
Everything after your third sentence is completely irrelevant to the question, and everything up through the third sentence has already been said by other users. –  jwodder Nov 9 at 6:03
    
The Legolas of Gondolin, was a Noldor of the Gondolindrim House of the Tree, not a green elf Teleri as is Legolas of Mirkwood. So it's absolutly certain that he's not the same. Only a namesake, like the Glorfindel of Gondolin is not the same as the Glorfindel of Rivendell. –  Joel Dec 4 at 3:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.