Timeline for How was Ramirez's sword forged over 1,500 years before katana swordsmithing techniques were perfected in Japan?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2019 at 21:42 | history | edited | Jenayah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
alt text for accessibility purposes
|
| Nov 7, 2017 at 8:39 | history | edited | Valorum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2017 at 8:35 | comment | added | ip6 | There should have been only one! | |
| Aug 27, 2015 at 20:11 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | Connor didn't fail because he lacked the magical abilities. He failed because he didn't believe </yoda> | |
| Aug 26, 2015 at 14:44 | comment | added | RobertF | Thanks Richard, this explanation makes sense even if Highlander 2 and 3 were stinkers. Now the question is if "alien technology" was intended to be the original explanation for the sword's age in the first movie, but there wasn't room to cover the origin story for the Immortals as exiles from another planet? | |
| Aug 26, 2015 at 10:04 | comment | added | Valorum | @timb - You had to look, didn't you? | |
| Aug 26, 2015 at 9:33 | comment | added | Tim B | There is no second film. Or third film. They did not happen. Someone just created a completely unrelated film and happened to call it Highlander...it's the only explanation... | |
| Aug 26, 2015 at 9:27 | comment | added | Boluc Papuccuoglu | Second film? What second film? | |
| Aug 26, 2015 at 8:40 | history | edited | Valorum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 694 characters in body
|
| Aug 26, 2015 at 7:37 | history | answered | Valorum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |