Timeline for Are any ships in Star Wars capable of intergalactic travel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 26, 2020 at 15:40 | history | edited | DavidW | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
switch to https
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Nov 20, 2016 at 2:48 | answer | added | naboo 23 | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 21, 2016 at 6:15 | answer | added | Wad Cheber | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 3, 2015 at 22:12 | comment | added | Martin Schröder | Yes; see the answers to Where was the Rebel fleet's rendezvous point at the end of The Empire Strikes Back?. | |
Aug 30, 2015 at 0:26 | comment | added | Derek | The 'forming star' is surrounded by a lot of gas and dust, and the whole thing glows. The star at the center is obviously much smaller. Planetary nebula (where such solar systems develop) can be many light years in size - ever heard of a globular cluster? whether the other 'bright dots' are stars in the foreground or background (can't tell from that photo) is up for debate. | |
Aug 29, 2015 at 6:05 | comment | added | Andrew Thompson | @Derek "This looks more like a solar system in its early stages of development.." So what are those 'bright dots' in the foreground? Fireflies? They are too big to say they are anything but stars, and the 'forming star' that is behind them would have to be light years in width before it could appear that large to the observers. | |
Aug 29, 2015 at 5:44 | comment | added | Derek | This looks more like a solar system in its early stages of development... the star already formed but the rest is just a giant dust/gas/rock ball that hasn't coalesced into planets yet. | |
Aug 29, 2015 at 2:42 | comment | added | Ryan Reich | That's not a galaxy; it's an early solar system. It's just one star with some gas that hasn't yet coalesced into planets. | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 20:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/637357888017682433 | ||
Aug 28, 2015 at 16:56 | comment | added | Phyneas | @Ellesedil - in my answer below there some reference links discussing what they are looking at. | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 16:55 | comment | added | Ellesedil | Could it be possible that the image is not depicting an entire galaxy, but instead a supermassive black hole that just so happens to have a lot of stars and other gases orbiting around it? | |
S Aug 28, 2015 at 16:28 | history | suggested | Phyneas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed your quote by adding another 'far' to it
|
Aug 28, 2015 at 15:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 28, 2015 at 16:28 | |||||
Aug 28, 2015 at 15:14 | comment | added | Chris B. Behrens | Nah, you can see it moving. That means it's got to be pretty small, i.e., moon-sized, and super-insanely dense. That doesn't preclude some Star Wars magic, however... | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 15:10 | answer | added | Phyneas | timeline score: 9 | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 14:34 | answer | added | ThePopMachine | timeline score: 35 | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 12:47 | comment | added | Zorawar | I don't think it's likely they are inside of another galaxy viewing that one: for one thing stars can exist outside of a galaxy; and then you'd also expect to see lots more stars in the sky and for the pull of the two galaxies to be distorting one another... | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 12:20 | history | edited | Andrew Thompson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Aug 28, 2015 at 12:07 | vote | accept | Andrew Thompson | ||
Aug 28, 2015 at 10:10 | answer | added | Petersaber | timeline score: 47 | |
Aug 28, 2015 at 9:47 | history | asked | Andrew Thompson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |