Timeline for What was the general critical reaction to Star Trek: The Motion Picture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 1:07 | history | edited | Rand al'Thor♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2015 at 20:14 | comment | added | GreenMatt | "special effects overshadowed other elements of the film" highlights the double standards of some critics. The same thing could be said of many films before and since which werecritically acclaimed films (as well as those which were blockbusters at the box office, but critically panned). | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 17:38 | comment | added | Reinstate Monica -- notmaynard | "...pulling the philosophic chestnuts of Roddenberry and his co-writers out of the fire" cracks me up for some reason. | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 16:38 | comment | added | Sredni Vashtar | Let's not forget the other nickname: "Star Trek: where Nomad has gone before". In relation to "The changeling" episode. (the other post where this is mentioned wasn't there, in my timeline. Must have flipped into another parallel universe. Again.) | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 13:27 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | haha those alternative names are genius | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 2:27 | comment | added | hobbs | Many of these reviews correlate well with one of the film's nicknames: "Star Trek: The Motionless Picture" | |
| Nov 23, 2015 at 0:53 | vote | accept | Fingolfin | ||
| Nov 26, 2015 at 0:44 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2015 at 23:12 | vote | accept | Fingolfin | ||
| Nov 23, 2015 at 0:53 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2015 at 22:52 | history | answered | Rand al'Thor♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |