Skip to main content
Science Fiction & Fantasy

Return to Question

Clarify wording
Source Link
Blackwood
Blackwood
  • 21.3k
  • 7
  • 104
  • 107

There are many occasions where saucer separation on the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D) would have come in handy but it was only done a few times.

Is there a reason they did not do it more often? It seemed to take only a few minutes to disconnect and a few minutes more theto reconnect.

I am guessing that it was hard on the ship and would require follow up maintenance.

There are many occasions where saucer separation on the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D) would have come in handy but it was only done a few times.

Is there a reason they did not do it often? It seemed to take only a few minutes to disconnect and a few minutes more the reconnect.

I am guessing that it was hard on the ship and would require follow up maintenance.

There are many occasions where saucer separation on the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D) would have come in handy but it was only done a few times.

Is there a reason they did not do it more often? It seemed to take only a few minutes to disconnect and a few minutes more to reconnect.

I am guessing that it was hard on the ship and would require follow up maintenance.

edited tags
Link
Valorum
Valorum
  • 718.1k
  • 163
  • 4.8k
  • 5k
Tweeted twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/674194477800628224
Source Link
HighInBC
HighInBC
  • 935
  • 1
  • 7
  • 19

Why was the saucer separation so rarely done on the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D)

There are many occasions where saucer separation on the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D) would have come in handy but it was only done a few times.

Is there a reason they did not do it often? It seemed to take only a few minutes to disconnect and a few minutes more the reconnect.

I am guessing that it was hard on the ship and would require follow up maintenance.