Skip to main content
added 834 characters in body
Source Link
Mithical
  • 39.1k
  • 17
  • 182
  • 230

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be seen here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description hereTV Guide, "close up". The Star Strek listing (C), at 7:30. An upside-picture of the Enterprise is shown from the episode "The Tholian Web". The text on the side says: This episode won an Emmy nomination for its special optical effects (frame-by-frame animation by Van der Veer Photo Effects, Hollywood). Mr. Spock takes command of the Enterprise when Captain Kirk vanishes in limbo between two space fields. As Kirk appears and disappears with ghostly irregularity, Spock's rescue operations are hampered by the crew's mysterious madness and by alien spacecraft, slowly weaving a deadly web around the disabled Enterprise. Spock: Leonard Nimoy. Dr. McCoy: DeForest Kelley. Kirk: William Shatner. Scott: James Doohan. Chekov: Walter Koenig. Uhura: Nichelle Nichols. Nurse Chapel: Majel Barret. Sulu: George Takei. Lieutenant O'Neil: Sean Morgan. (Rerun: 60 min.)

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be seen here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description here

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be seen here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

TV Guide, "close up". The Star Strek listing (C), at 7:30. An upside-picture of the Enterprise is shown from the episode "The Tholian Web". The text on the side says: This episode won an Emmy nomination for its special optical effects (frame-by-frame animation by Van der Veer Photo Effects, Hollywood). Mr. Spock takes command of the Enterprise when Captain Kirk vanishes in limbo between two space fields. As Kirk appears and disappears with ghostly irregularity, Spock's rescue operations are hampered by the crew's mysterious madness and by alien spacecraft, slowly weaving a deadly web around the disabled Enterprise. Spock: Leonard Nimoy. Dr. McCoy: DeForest Kelley. Kirk: William Shatner. Scott: James Doohan. Chekov: Walter Koenig. Uhura: Nichelle Nichols. Nurse Chapel: Majel Barret. Sulu: George Takei. Lieutenant O'Neil: Sean Morgan. (Rerun: 60 min.)

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
Hypnosifl
  • 57.2k
  • 5
  • 192
  • 245

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be seeseen here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description here

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be see here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description here

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be seen here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description here

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

added 258 characters in body
Source Link
Hypnosifl
  • 57.2k
  • 5
  • 192
  • 245

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does collaboratecorroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." ThoughThe TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be see here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description here

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does collaborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

Reading the story where 'ToSeek's graphic comes from, though does corroborate your information that Gene Roddenberry and the NBC people did in fact see and like the upside down ship model. The story goes on to say that "TV Guide came out, they ran a picture of the ship on the cover, upside down." The TV Guide image that this probably refers to can be see here (it's not actually a cover, but Matt Jeffries' memory may have been slightly off):

enter image description here

Though as Matt Jefferies goes on to say, that wasn't what he was intending with his wooden model and that it immediately "flopped over, because the birch dowels were heavier! I had an awful time trying to unsell that" to Gene.

As for more ships designed to be upside down, I believe that in many of the spin offs of Star Trek you can see some type of variation of either a saucer or engine tubes. Many of these examples can be found in the Federation Ship Recognition Manual from FASA back in 1985. But while an engine on top of a saucer may 'look' upside down, I believe that the intention is that the crew is still standing 'rightside up'. as the request from Roddenberry was " that we didn't have to worry about gravity" and "wanted" it "to be as practical as possible".

Hope this helps some.

updated link to archived version
Source Link
Chris
  • 4k
  • 4
  • 26
  • 41
Loading
Corrected minor typos.
Source Link
Major Stackings
  • 63.7k
  • 59
  • 277
  • 551
Loading
Source Link
Chris
  • 4k
  • 4
  • 26
  • 41
Loading