Skip to main content
added 1 character in body
Source Link
pdeschain
  • 353
  • 1
  • 11

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too.

The following cases are illustrative for my point:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story;
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius;
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance;
  • How did Death Eaters conceal their identities from Aurors and Order of Phoenix (who were actual bloody vigilantes and didn't care about laws and stuff as much), when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too.

The following cases are illustrative for my point:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story;
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius;
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance;
  • How did Death Eaters conceal their identities from Aurors and Order of Phoenix (who were actual bloody vigilantes and didn't care about laws and stuff as much), when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too.

The following cases are illustrative for my point:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story;
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius;
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance;
  • How did Death Eaters conceal their identities from Aurors and Order of Phoenix (who were actual bloody vigilantes and didn't care about laws and stuff as much), when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".
Post Closed as "Needs more focus" by DVK-on-Ahch-To, Jason Baker, Rand al'Thor, Doctor Doom, alexwlchan
corrected confusing wording
Source Link
pdeschain
  • 353
  • 1
  • 11

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too. There are many

The following cases where that sort of question should've been asked in the storyare illustrative for my point:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story?story;
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius?Imperius;
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance?allegiance;
  • How did Death Eaters hideconceal their identities from Aurors and Order of Phoenix (who were actual bloody vigilantes and didn't care about laws and stuff as much), when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too. There are many cases where that sort of question should've been asked in the story:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story?
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius?
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance?
  • How did Death Eaters hide from Aurors, when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too.

The following cases are illustrative for my point:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story;
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius;
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance;
  • How did Death Eaters conceal their identities from Aurors and Order of Phoenix (who were actual bloody vigilantes and didn't care about laws and stuff as much), when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".
Source Link
pdeschain
  • 353
  • 1
  • 11

Why Magical Law Enforcement are completely idiotic in terms of proving/disproving someone's guilt?

So, basically what do we have:

  • Imperius curse
  • Terror tactics
  • Legillemency / Occlumency
  • Veritaserum
  • Cruciatus curse
  • Memory extraction spells + Pensieves
  • Obliviation
  • Confundus
  • Priori Incantatem

How the hell do you prove/disprove anyone's guilt? Or an even better question - why didn't Wizengamot's triggerhappies actually use all (or a combination) of the above-mentioned tools to extract the truth from the people they judged? I'm not suggesting that everything should start with a good-ol Crucio - we can always begin with something less powerful and dangerous - a Confundus could literally make a person confused and spill the beans. Memory extraction isn't considered harmful too. There are many cases where that sort of question should've been asked in the story:

  • How come did Sirius Black end up in jail, when it was soooooo damn easy to check his story?
  • How did Lucius Malfoy sell his story about being under Imperius?
  • How did Pettigrew and other traitors conceal their allegiance?
  • How did Death Eaters hide from Aurors, when Aurors had a right to use the unforgivable curses. I can easily imagine Mad-Eye doing something along the following: "Imperio. Now tell me everything. Thank you, Avada Kedavra".