Timeline for Does the quality of their wand generally indicate the caliber of the witch or wizard that uses it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 24, 2020 at 18:41 | history | suggested | user89356 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
thier -> their; owners -> owner's
|
| Dec 24, 2020 at 18:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 24, 2020 at 18:41 | |||||
| Jan 26, 2016 at 6:05 | vote | accept | Major Stackings | ||
| Jan 24, 2016 at 0:14 | answer | added | ibid | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 21:14 | answer | added | ArtOfCode | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 20:47 | comment | added | ThruGog | Pottermore does make suggestions about rarer cores and woods, and describes some woods as "sought after" or particularly popular in a certain country. I can imagine cherry or something might have status above pine or other common trees. Whether these perceptions would be accurate would be another matter I think. | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 20:05 | comment | added | Matt Gutting | That's how to describe it, maybe, but what exactly do the terms correspond to? Something about the physical makeup of the wands? If so, what? What puts a wand in one category or another? | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 19:44 | comment | added | Major Stackings | @Au101 I would define it as "Top of the line", "High end", "Above average", or "Bargain basement", "Low end", or "Fair to middlin". | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 19:27 | comment | added | Au101 | How would you define 'quality' for the purposes of this question? | |
| Jan 23, 2016 at 18:57 | history | asked | Major Stackings | CC BY-SA 3.0 |