Timeline for According to the Rule of Two, what happens if the Master defeats the Apprentice in a challenge?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2016 at 20:42 | answer | added | The Mandolorian | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 2, 2016 at 4:10 | comment | added | TylerH | It wouldn't be a duel to the death in the first place if the master submits to the apprentice. So... either the apprentice kills the master or the master kills the apprentice. Either way, the survivor looks for a new apprentice. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 19:45 | history | edited | Null♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved grammar
|
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:37 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/694197869465706496 | ||
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:35 | comment | added | user40790 | The Sith and Decepticons have the same philosophy: let Starscream live, as long as he does his job well. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:17 | answer | added | Null♦ | timeline score: 29 | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:15 | comment | added | The Fallen | I'll have to look up the references later, but in one of the Darth Bane books, this is adressed by Darth Bane when speaking to Darth Zannah | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 16:06 | answer | added | Victor Stafusa | timeline score: 10 | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:08 | comment | added | Xantec | Just shooting off the top of my head here: it is certainly the intention of the apprentice to kill the master so that they may usurp the role of master, but more than likely the master would not kill their apprentice, since the apprentice obviously still has more learn. | |
| Feb 1, 2016 at 15:03 | history | asked | thegreatjedi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |