Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 16, 2019 at 23:38 vote accept CraigH
Sep 6, 2017 at 4:14 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/905282950459207686
Sep 6, 2017 at 1:28 history edited Möoz CC BY-SA 3.0
added 8 characters in body
Sep 6, 2017 at 1:28 answer added Möoz timeline score: 4
Sep 6, 2017 at 0:50 history edited Möoz
edited tags
Aug 21, 2017 at 15:53 comment added Flater @user568458: Why does it not make sense? Bronn has a massive target to hit (an oil stain on relatively calm water surface), could fire several arrows even if he would miss, and the lack of a fiery boat makes the approach less suspicious to Stannis' troops, who now only realize that it's a trap when they're right next to the boat. If anything, Bronn's arrow can be avoided less than the single burning boat.
S Nov 18, 2016 at 14:10 history edited SQB CC BY-SA 3.0
Remove redondant precision "GoT"; copy edited and removed salutation
S Nov 18, 2016 at 14:10 history suggested Bebs V CC BY-SA 3.0
Remove redondant precision "GoT".
Nov 18, 2016 at 13:55 review Suggested edits
S Nov 18, 2016 at 14:10
Mar 11, 2016 at 9:23 comment added user56reinstatemonica8 I think the details of that particular scene are ones we have to accept as "It doesn't make very much sense, but looks awesome so it's worth it". (if I remember correctly, GRRM personally wrote that episode, so we can't just blame the producers this time!)
Mar 10, 2016 at 19:15 comment added CraigH Oh, that's a big difference! Thanks!
Mar 10, 2016 at 19:12 comment added TLP In the books, Bronn was holding the towers raising the chain and had nothing to do with the fire. The fire was started by a burning ship ramming the boat with the wildfire inside it. The fire came from normal anti-ship weapons, such as fire arrows and burning pitch.
Mar 10, 2016 at 18:56 review First posts
Mar 10, 2016 at 18:58
Mar 10, 2016 at 18:53 history asked CraigH CC BY-SA 3.0