Timeline for Would a Basilisk kill a freshly "killed" Voldemort?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2016 at 14:17 | vote | accept | Anoplexian | ||
| Mar 30, 2016 at 19:06 | comment | added | ibid | @Ellesedil - I misread your comment. Eitherway petrifcation in HP doesn't really turn people to stone, just freeze them (until they drink that mandrake potion). I would imagine that putting the petrified body though a meatgrinder would be deemed "killing". | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 18:59 | history | edited | ibid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2016 at 18:53 | history | edited | ibid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 579 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2016 at 17:35 | comment | added | Ellesedil | So... what you're saying then is that instead of spending years hunting for and destroying Horcruxes, all Dumbledore had to do was show Voldemort a reflection of a Basilisk to turn him into stone, then break the statute into multiple pieces and it's good game? I'm sure Dumbledore and Harry could have arranged that together in much less time, and Dumbledore wouldn't even have to die. | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 17:32 | comment | added | ibid | @Anoplexian - He felt Quirrells presence. I don't think he actually saw him. | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 17:27 | history | answered | ibid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |