Timeline for Why didn't Harry Potter teach his son to duel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2012 at 13:11 | comment | added | NominSim | @NiceOrc Harry in general follows the rules unless he feels like someone is in danger. The only time he ever broke this particular rule himself was to save himself and Dudley. | |
| Apr 16, 2012 at 9:26 | comment | added | NiceOrc | And Harry's always been such a strict follower of that rule? Or any rules at all, for that matter? | |
| Mar 13, 2012 at 16:43 | comment | added | NominSim | @DVK The exemption comes from the fact that there is no way to trace the magic to a single person. The parents are supposed to restrict the magic use of their children, which is why Harry wouldn't have taught his son dueling. Additionally, dueling requires a wand, which I believe would remove the exemption. | |
| Mar 13, 2012 at 16:36 | comment | added | DVK-on-Ahch-To | Children under the age of eleven, who have little control over their abilities and no wands, are exempt from the law, though in wizarding families their parents are expected to keep them under control. | |
| Mar 13, 2012 at 16:27 | history | answered | NominSim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |