Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Jul 3, 2016 at 20:50 comment added wizzwizz4 @jpmc26 Hey, we've pulled some of them. Just not the breaking changes.
Jul 3, 2016 at 16:14 comment added Patrice @Janus so Harry wouldn't be able to understand a smake who wasn't 'english' because he'd be speaking German through parseltongue? Feels awkward to me...
Jul 3, 2016 at 13:52 comment added Janus Bahs Jacquet I’m not sure if I quite agree with this answer. I think jingyu9575’s answer below, while not fleshed out, is probably closer to the mark. Parseltongue isn’t a language as such: it’s a way of representing language through a different set of speech organs. The snake in the zoo was speaking English through Parseltongue. So I’d say Harry would hear whatever language the snake was actually speaking. (This of course entails that snakes underlyingly speak human languages, which is nonsense—but that’s always been how I read the books, nonsense or not.)
Jul 3, 2016 at 2:41 comment added jpmc26 @Valorum No, we speak a fork of British English. We needed to improve on it, but you guys wouldn't pull our change requests.
Jul 2, 2016 at 23:32 comment added Major Stackings Engish speakers? I think most of us are merely english typers. We'd probably require translators in order for everybody to be able to understand eachother face to face. ;)
Jul 2, 2016 at 21:35 comment added Valorum Americans also speak a garbled form of English, you say?
Jul 2, 2016 at 21:17 comment added Adamant @Valorum - No doubt. By American English speakers (such as myself) as well.
Jul 2, 2016 at 21:17 comment added Valorum For the record, although the word "Amigo" isn't a British-English word, it's a word that would be immediately understood by British-English speakers
Jul 2, 2016 at 21:06 history edited Adamant CC BY-SA 3.0
added 150 characters in body
Jul 2, 2016 at 20:56 history answered Adamant CC BY-SA 3.0