Timeline for Is there a fundamental difference between Care of Magical Creatures animals and DADA ones?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2016 at 2:34 | answer | added | DariM | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 23:12 | comment | added | ThruGog | I think that's a very close duplicate, but I'd love to know if there's any evidence about the DADA ones being Dark Magic (like you can imagine a basilisk might be with their origins being born from an egg under a toad or whatever it was) whereas you can be sure that Buckbeak and Fawkes are intended to be lovely magical creatures. | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 22:49 | comment | added | Adamant | Possible duplicate: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/38337/… | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 22:46 | comment | added | ThruGog | @bleh - LOL maybe Hagrid petitions to get them all transferred to his subject. They're not dangerous or Dark if you just care for them correctly! | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 22:44 | comment | added | bleh | It was more of a joke on Hagrid..... | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 22:43 | comment | added | ThruGog | @bleh - If you're saying dangerous ones are all dealt with in DADA, that isn't true, looking at Hippogriffs as just one example. And calling a dangerous animal Dark Arts seems very harsh to me! | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 22:25 | comment | added | bleh | Some of them are dangerous (magical creatures) and some of them aren't. | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 22:24 | history | asked | ThruGog | CC BY-SA 3.0 |