Timeline for Why would a slug thrower be more effective against a lightsaber/Jedi than a blaster?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2023 at 3:01 | comment | added | Pui Ho Lam | The blasters are only slow for the viewers to see. Blasters are not the only thing got slowed down by George Lucas, light saber duels too. If you've played video games, they fire just as fast as any modern day assault rifles. | |
| Mar 30, 2012 at 15:15 | comment | added | Rex Kerr | @Xantec - The rate of fire of bolts is much lower, leaving more time to reorient the blade. | |
| Mar 30, 2012 at 13:42 | comment | added | Xantec |
In general, one could position the blade to catch the first two slugs, but then would have to move it to catch the third. The same applies to blocking bolts, which they don't seem to have too much trouble with (as long as they aren't ambushed).
|
|
| Mar 25, 2012 at 19:21 | history | answered | Rex Kerr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |