Timeline for Was Ariana Dumbledore an Obscurus?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017 at 21:25 | answer | added | ThePerksofbeingaPotterPhan | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 2:59 | history | edited | Edlothiad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
An unnecessary tag
|
| S Apr 12, 2017 at 2:55 | history | suggested | Obsidia |
I added two tags.
|
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 2:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 12, 2017 at 2:55 | |||||
| Dec 28, 2016 at 12:14 | comment | added | Anu7 | @RichS not necessarily killed her. Remember that the MoM of Britain + the ties with muggles is much more forward thinking. Now the MACUSA and its ties with the american population was a much more sensitive one. | |
| Dec 21, 2016 at 5:42 | comment | added | RichS | "[If] the Ministry had known what Ariana had become, she’d have been locked up in St. Mungo’s for good." If she was an Obscurus, the Ministry of Magic probably would not have locked her up. They would have killed her. | |
| Dec 20, 2016 at 22:05 | answer | added | ibid | timeline score: 11 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 5:36 | answer | added | Nana | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 12, 2016 at 20:12 | vote | accept | CHEESE | ||
| Dec 8, 2016 at 13:04 | comment | added | Valorum | @CHEESE - If someone was daft enough to ask them, I'd vote to close as "Future works" will undoubtedly answer them | |
| Dec 8, 2016 at 12:57 | comment | added | CHEESE | @Valorum Do you plan on ever asking these? | |
| Dec 6, 2016 at 22:35 | answer | added | Valorum | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 22:57 | answer | added | Martin | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 16:13 | answer | added | Dave Johnson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 7:32 | answer | added | Anu7 | timeline score: 32 | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 4:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/803097767388319744 | ||
| Nov 27, 2016 at 19:21 | comment | added | Valorum | And given that Newt already had an Obscurus in his case, and was possibly working on Dumbledore's orders to track down the Obscurus in New York, "Was Newt hunting Obscuri?" | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 19:15 | comment | added | Valorum | And given that Grindewald was wearing a Hallows necklace, was he there to investigate the Hallows or to find an Obscurus. | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 19:10 | comment | added | Valorum | Which also leads to the question, was Grindlewald attracted to Dumbledore's family because he could sense an Obscurus? | |
| Nov 27, 2016 at 14:42 | history | asked | CHEESE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |