Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 5, 2017 at 19:30 vote accept UmßraDivisio
Jan 5, 2017 at 12:06 comment added Broklynite @KyleJones now now, no need to be honest.
Jan 4, 2017 at 19:12 answer added Bob timeline score: 3
Dec 31, 2016 at 0:49 comment added Kyle Jones Trying to treat Star Wars like science fiction is like treating The Jetsons like science fiction. You're putting way more thought into it than the people who made it.
Dec 30, 2016 at 21:36 comment added Ixrec "at Light Speed an extra 100-300 feet of depth in shield is negligible" is a pretty strong assumption. For all we know about Star Wars shield technology that could make all the difference. (Un?)fortunately Han Solo never told us how many nanoparsecs it takes for the shield to cycle or refresh or whatever.
Dec 30, 2016 at 21:23 comment added UmßraDivisio Sure less time going through the shields, but at Light Speed an extra 100-300 feet of depth in shield is negligible. And that's assuming that shields have a depth at all. But as to less time to be noticed, as stated in other posts, it would seem that they were so sure of their defenses that they didn't even consider looking below the shield so that doesn't make a lot of sense
Dec 30, 2016 at 21:20 comment added CBredlow Going perpendicular to the planet means less time trying to pass through the planet's shields, also less chance of being noticed if you go straight down.
Dec 30, 2016 at 21:06 comment added Valorum Because he's a schmuck
Dec 30, 2016 at 21:00 history asked UmßraDivisio CC BY-SA 3.0