Timeline for Why does the Obscurus not appear in the textbook?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 19, 2017 at 12:57 | comment | added | Skooba - Stands Against AI | @Valorum I am not seeing where they say this is redacted version, having read just the it, I would be keen to know where you are discerning this from? | |
| Jan 19, 2017 at 12:49 | comment | added | Valorum | The introduction of Fantastic Beasts (the book) notes that it's redacted for Muggles readership. It's only natural that some creatures would be missing. | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 22:13 | comment | added | Skooba - Stands Against AI | +1 for pointing out other beasts are not included. I offer some other observations as well....Dumbledore says it is a "duplicate". However, he could be less than honest as well. Newt also includes many species that straddle the beast/being/spirit line in the book. | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 21:56 | comment | added | CHEESE | Great answer, +1. You found what I needed. | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 21:54 | history | answered | Adamant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |