Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13, 2017 at 9:50 vote accept Fatalize
Mar 7, 2017 at 22:12 comment added 11684 @fredsbend There we only learn about the traces magic leaves in wands, not the traces in enchanted objects.
Mar 7, 2017 at 18:38 comment added user15742 "We learn in the Half Blood Prince that every use of magic leaves some trail." I would say we learned that in Goblet of Fire, when they charm Harry's wand to reveal it's last spell.
Mar 7, 2017 at 15:54 comment added chirlu @anotherdave: For example, in order to have a pleasant chat with the house elfs.
Mar 7, 2017 at 14:19 comment added anotherdave Follow up question — Why would Dumbledore resort to the inconvenience of walking all the way down to the kitchen to get hot chocolate, instead of the million magic ways he could have gotten it? :)
Mar 7, 2017 at 14:00 comment added Carcigenicate @TheLethalCoder Ya! From the wrist. I think I actually saw someone it the movies do that with their wand...
Mar 7, 2017 at 12:21 comment added TheLethalCarrot @Carcigenicate Get an Assassins Creed style Hidden Wand for greater effect... and for cool/awesome points.
Mar 7, 2017 at 8:24 comment added Demosthenes @neverendingqs, McGonagall might have thought that Dumbledore has a wand. She also could have imagined the attacker thought the same when he/she noticed Dumbledore was coming. If the Headmaster actually had a wand with him is another thing.
Mar 7, 2017 at 3:10 comment added Wildcard @neverendingqs, Dumbledore didn't do anything, though. Colin was already out of danger, actually; he was petrified, so he couldn't have been killed by the basilisk's gaze afterward. But McGonagall didn't know that. (And being there all night with an unknown menace around wouldn't sound very safe.)
Mar 6, 2017 at 23:59 comment added Carcigenicate If I was a wizard, I'd carry my wand everywhere. I'd probably get a holster grafted to my arm.
Mar 6, 2017 at 17:07 comment added neverendingqs Dumbledore probably had his wand with him. Otherwise, McGonagall's statement doesn't make as much sense (questionable how much could Dumbledore do without his wand?)
Mar 6, 2017 at 15:28 history answered Demosthenes CC BY-SA 3.0