Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 27, 2018 at 2:32 answer added Sasuga timeline score: 1
May 15, 2017 at 0:19 history edited Möoz
edited tags
May 11, 2017 at 9:31 comment added Flater The best way to visualize this is having a look at a washing machine. The drum rotates, laundry sticks to the inside of the drum. And yes, as @JDoe said, laundry does not stick to the axis of rotation, but rather tries to stay as far away from it (perpendicularly speaking) as possible.
Apr 17, 2017 at 18:44 vote accept hitchhiker
Apr 8, 2017 at 8:48 comment added Valorum @JDoe - If you rotated it along the long axis, you'd have maximum living space along the inside with the poles reserved for zero-g docking
Apr 8, 2017 at 1:55 review Close votes
Apr 8, 2017 at 6:47
Apr 7, 2017 at 22:42 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/850479014804410368
Apr 7, 2017 at 21:48 comment added J Doe This also means that the living space must be limited to under the equator. There won't be any artificial gravity under the poles.
Apr 7, 2017 at 21:29 history edited tobiasvl CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Apr 7, 2017 at 21:08 answer added Valorum timeline score: 12
Apr 7, 2017 at 21:00 comment added Petersaber Eros takes advantage of centrifugal force. Floors are placed in such a way, that when you stand inside, your feet are pointed towards space, and your head is pointing at the center of the asteroid. PS: that also means that everywhere you go is uphill on Eros. Huh.
Apr 7, 2017 at 20:57 history edited Gallifreyan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
Apr 7, 2017 at 20:49 comment added jonrsharpe You're thinking of it upside down; on Eros and the other inhabited asteroids they live inside, with the floor being furthest from the core. See e.g. expanse.wikia.com/wiki/Ceres, which shows a map of Ceres where the "lowest" levels are closest to the surface.
Apr 7, 2017 at 20:47 history asked hitchhiker CC BY-SA 3.0