Timeline for Is a Parselmouth immune to the effects of the stare of the Basilisk?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 at 11:42 | comment | added | xDaizu | "Parseltongue is a language, though an inherent one, and as such cannot afford the speaker immunity against the Basilisk." Why not? Citation needed! The gene combination that allows communicating with snakes could also grant immunity to snake venoms and death stares. I'm not saying that it does, but you'd need proof to discard that possibility. | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 23:09 | comment | added | Wildcard | @T.E.D., don't you remember Harry taunting the Death Eaters about that? Quote is something like, "Voldemort? He's a half-blood, did you know that? Yeah, his mum was a witch, but his dad was a muggle! Or has he been telling you lot he's pureblood?" | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 22:15 | comment | added | T.E.D. | @KyleV - So you are implying that Potterverse bigots don't use the one-drop rule? | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 17:50 | comment | added | charleen langley | Ah, yes, sorry. | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 15:10 | comment | added | Kyle V | "he was a Mudblood, after all, and the Basilisk was raised by Slytherin himself to attack any non-purebloods." Tom Riddle was a half-blood, not a Mudblood. | |
| Apr 20, 2017 at 14:52 | history | answered | charleen langley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |