Timeline for How did they get the working dream share device inside dreams in Inception?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 9, 2015 at 11:16 | vote | accept | LifeH2O | ||
Feb 8, 2015 at 18:40 | comment | added | John | @LifeH2O, are you still looking for a more apt answer? You haven't selected any of the answers yet. | |
Apr 14, 2012 at 9:13 | comment | added | user5421 | The machine was fully functional in the same way as all their watches, tube lights, ACs, vehicles were fully functional. | |
Nov 3, 2011 at 21:12 | comment | added | Loki Astari | @Mark: Hard to make that claim until we reach the technological standpoint to actual do and measure it maybe they are using artistic license maybe they are just predicting the future. Who knows we may one learn to travel faster than light. | |
S Nov 3, 2011 at 10:09 | history | suggested | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improve grammar in title
|
Nov 3, 2011 at 9:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 3, 2011 at 10:09 | |||||
S Nov 3, 2011 at 8:45 | history | suggested | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improve grammar
|
Nov 3, 2011 at 7:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 3, 2011 at 8:45 | |||||
Aug 23, 2011 at 23:17 | answer | added | Ricardo | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 3, 2011 at 15:39 | comment | added | Mark Rogers | Inception wasn't a very scientific movie, I mean a dream inside of a dream is still just a one-level dream, time isn't going to be distorted any further. There's no great significance to the dream machines inside their dreams. If the writers cared about details like that they couldn't have made the movie. | |
Feb 3, 2011 at 3:27 | answer | added | Dima | timeline score: 19 | |
Feb 3, 2011 at 2:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/32985745622827008 | ||
Feb 3, 2011 at 0:39 | answer | added | Brenton Taylor | timeline score: 27 | |
Feb 3, 2011 at 0:19 | history | asked | LifeH2O | CC BY-SA 2.5 |