Timeline for Does the Crumple-Horned Snorkack exist?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Mar 29, 2018 at 22:36 | history | edited | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
Oct 14, 2017 at 12:14 | vote | accept | Rand al'Thor♦ | ||
Apr 25, 2017 at 0:57 | history | edited | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 932 characters in body
|
Apr 24, 2017 at 15:32 | comment | added | Obsidia | @MrLister Thanks! :) | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 6:15 | comment | added | Mr Lister | @Bellatrix Heh... go ahead. | |
Apr 23, 2017 at 17:21 | comment | added | Obsidia | @MrLister Good point! I didn't even notice that until you mentioned it, so thanks! Would you mind if I expand on it and edit it into my answer? I think that's significant enough evidence that it should be included. | |
Apr 23, 2017 at 17:18 | comment | added | Obsidia | @Randal'Thor Sure! I've added the link in. Also, here's the text of the entire post - J. K. Rowling has said that they are not real. The Lovegoods' obsession is a sign of their general gullibility and disengagement with reality. | |
Apr 23, 2017 at 17:11 | history | edited | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 511 characters in body
|
Apr 23, 2017 at 11:49 | comment | added | Mr Lister | I wish to state here for the record that the one at the Wizarding World exhibition looks like it's been sewn together from parts of other animals, like a Frankenstein monster. So probably not real. | |
Apr 23, 2017 at 11:21 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor♦ | Re your last paragraph: could you possibly link to this post? Even if it doesn't cite a proper source, it's still interesting to see what other people have concluded about this. | |
Apr 23, 2017 at 8:42 | history | answered | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |