Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 4, 2017 at 19:09 comment added GeoffAtkins I always thought that besides the people on Mandalore (who adopted a pacifist philosophy) and Death Watch (who even the warrior Mando'a considered to be terrorists), there was a wide diaspora of clans who clung to the warrior mentality, such as those of Concord Dawn.
Jun 4, 2017 at 19:09 comment added psubsee2003 That's reasonable. I guess I saw it from the perspective that the society didn't overthrow Satine immediately, and Death Watch needed multiple attempts and a lot of help to finally remove her from power. Which makes me wonder whether the common person really supported the warrior culture or not.
Jun 4, 2017 at 19:01 comment added phantom42 And how is it shocking that a violent society who was told for a number of years that they weren't allowed to be, would be happy to be able to rejoin the battle once again? Especially when many of them did not agree with the policy to begin with.
Jun 4, 2017 at 19:01 comment added psubsee2003 Fair point but even without the KOTOR reference, in canon, Mandalorians seem to be coveted as warriors, except during the Clone Wars, even though it seems they still were. That's the inconsistency that makes me wonder
Jun 4, 2017 at 18:58 comment added phantom42 Be careful comparing them against KOTOR-era anything. That's no longer canon.
Jun 4, 2017 at 18:55 comment added psubsee2003 I get that but seems odd for a "warrior people" who seemed to relish battle (based on the Mandalorians from KOTOR era) to support an openly pacifist leader during a galactic conflict, and not run to join the war on either side, but then to turn around and be a warrior people again in the Imperial Era.
Jun 4, 2017 at 18:52 history answered phantom42 CC BY-SA 3.0