Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 28, 2019 at 17:31 answer added Alex timeline score: 0
Jan 2, 2019 at 4:00 history edited Obsidia
edited tags
Jul 10, 2017 at 14:01 history edited Voronwé
edited tags
Jul 4, 2017 at 21:56 comment added b_jonas See also movies.stackexchange.com/a/64051/9391 "Why didn't more beasts escape when Newt's suitcase was open?" which argues that most creatures wouldn't want to escape because they were comfortable in the suitcase.
Jul 4, 2017 at 14:31 comment added Callam Delaney So they could make a film about it
Jul 4, 2017 at 2:47 answer added Obsidia timeline score: 27
Jul 3, 2017 at 23:06 answer added Kevin timeline score: 7
Jul 3, 2017 at 21:34 comment added Valorum Because he's a schmuck
Jul 3, 2017 at 21:20 comment added DariM Yes, he needed the events of the movie to realise a small strap/lock was a good idea.
Jul 3, 2017 at 21:02 comment added DaaaahWhoosh As I recall, by the end of the film he has taken extra precautions to keep creatures from escaping, which implies that before arriving in New York he either didn't know they could escape or was confident he could handle it if they did.
Jul 3, 2017 at 20:58 comment added SJuan76 Well, saying "Actually the suitcase is full of magical and dangerous creatures" naturally leads to a) Scamander is led to a mental hospital and b) the suitcase is left without supervision in the hands of muggles who will just not ignore something of suspicious origin.
Jul 3, 2017 at 20:56 history edited Gallifreyan CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body; edited tags; edited title
Jul 3, 2017 at 20:51 comment added Schneejäger Would you leave a prison full of dangerous inmates unguarded? Or would you guard it even though there is a chance one or two will get out?
Jul 3, 2017 at 20:44 history asked 168Sean168 CC BY-SA 3.0