Timeline for Why was Dumbledore's portrait not given a more extensive role in the story?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 0:06 | comment | added | xXGrizZ | I believe it's implied that the portraits have all their memories as Snape and Dumbledore explicitly strategize a few times that we are told about and presumably constantly. Also, I agree that their basically would have been no book if the trio had access to the portrait and Rowling was right treat it how she did. | |
| May 11, 2012 at 12:20 | comment | added | Blue | oh, i must have missed that part... | |
| May 10, 2012 at 21:04 | comment | added | Nick Shaw | She was a ghost, not a portrait?... Or am I remembering wrong? Anyhow - I still don't think portraits have full memories necessarily. | |
| May 10, 2012 at 19:26 | comment | added | Blue | The founder's daughter(Ravenclaw) remembered where the Horcrux was. | |
| May 10, 2012 at 11:43 | history | answered | Nick Shaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |