Timeline for Have Chitauri been in Marvel movies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2020 at 12:21 | history | edited | TheLethalCarrot♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 138 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2017 at 20:25 | comment | added | KutuluMike | The exact quote from Feige was: “Skrulls have a big connection to ‘Fantastic Four.’ So there are some contractual limitations about who can do what when it comes to Skrulls". I don't know anything beyond that. | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 17:07 | comment | added | J Doe | @KutuluMike Besides not having the rights to Super-Skrull, what are those limits? Marvel plans to use the Skrulls in the Captain Marvel movie, which doesn't suggest any limits to me. | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 13:42 | comment | added | KutuluMike | That's possible; Avengers was a long time ago (in movie terms) and Fantastic Four didn't do well; Marvel may no longer be worried about what Fox may or may not want to do with them in the future (as opposed to e.g. having two Quicksilver/Scarlet Witch characters) | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 12:49 | comment | added | BMWurm | @KutuluMike I can't find it at the moment, but I do remember having seen a vid on youtube from this years SDCC (I've watched so many of them so I can't recall which one it was anymore) where Kevin Feige stated that - I think - Captain Marvel will be set in the 1980s (or something along those lines) and be the first MCU movie to feature the Skrulls... | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 11:30 | comment | added | KutuluMike | @JDoe I believe there are "limits" to what they can do with the Skrull in the MCU as well; but yes, they also didn't want to waste a big enemy as cannon fodder either. | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 2:44 | vote | accept | CodeMed | ||
| Jul 28, 2017 at 2:44 | comment | added | CodeMed | The one in the Collector's museum is why I am giving+1 in addition to simply marking this as the accepted answer. ... I think that the reason I did not remember is that they did not have speaking roles. | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 1:19 | comment | added | J Doe | Actually Marvel shares the rights to the Skrulls, like the Watchers and the Maximoff twins. They just don't have the rights to the Super-Skrull (or Uatu the Watcher). So they used the Chitauri for other reasons, perhaps so they could be shut down all at once. | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 1:09 | history | edited | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 268 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2017 at 1:01 | history | answered | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |