Timeline for Can Muggles see the Leaky Cauldron?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2017 at 15:34 | answer | added | atakanyenel | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 13, 2017 at 5:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/896612062293569536 | ||
| Aug 13, 2017 at 3:51 | history | edited | Obsidia |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 12, 2017 at 22:33 | vote | accept | Recelica | ||
| Aug 12, 2017 at 22:32 | comment | added | Recelica | Not really. It's purposely ambiguous. It could be that the Leaky Cauldron is invisible to Muggles, or, it could simply be that the leaky Cauldron appears so uninteresting, when compared with everything surrounding it, that it's as if Muggles can't see it. | |
| Aug 12, 2017 at 22:03 | comment | added | Mithical | Doesn't that quote make it very clear? No offense, but this question feels like 'can we believe what this says in this books'? I feel that the quote that you provided does not leave room for any doubt. | |
| Aug 12, 2017 at 21:46 | history | edited | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 12, 2017 at 19:33 | answer | added | Obsidia | timeline score: 19 | |
| Aug 12, 2017 at 19:16 | history | asked | Recelica | CC BY-SA 3.0 |