Skip to main content
replaced http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/ with https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/
Source Link

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael BurnhamMichael Burnham joins the USS DiscoveryUSS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore DriveSpore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefixNX prefix for experimental shipsexperimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't it a NX registry?

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael Burnham joins the USS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefix for experimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't it a NX registry?

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael Burnham joins the USS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefix for experimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't it a NX registry?

deleted 14 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Sekhemty
  • 15.3k
  • 11
  • 74
  • 116

If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't the ship nameit have ana NX in itregistry?

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael Burnham joins the USS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefix for experimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't the ship name have an NX in it a NX registry?

If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't the ship name have an NX in it?

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael Burnham joins the USS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefix for experimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't the ship name have an NX in it?

If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't it have a NX registry?

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael Burnham joins the USS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefix for experimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't it a NX registry?

Source Link
hawkeye
  • 10.1k
  • 11
  • 45
  • 92

If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't the ship name have an NX in it?

In Star Trek Discovery S1:E3 Context is for Kings the protagonist Michael Burnham joins the USS Discovery. She finds that the ship has an experimental Spore Drive.

We know that The Federation used the NX prefix for experimental ships.

But the Discovery's ship number is NCC-1031.

Indeed, the following commentator writes:

Shouldn't the Discovery have an NX prefix, since it's an experimental vessel, with a spore drive?

My question is: If the Discovery contains an experimental spore drive, why doesn't the ship name have an NX in it?