Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 19, 2018 at 4:58 history edited Möoz CC BY-SA 3.0
added 110 characters in body
Feb 19, 2018 at 4:57 answer added Möoz timeline score: 12
Jan 29, 2018 at 7:51 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/957883979214008321
Jan 28, 2018 at 22:46 comment added Odin1806 The call and response also was designed to evoke an emotional response from the subject. This could be pupil dilation, fidgeting, shakiness in the voice, maybe even sweating; but the key is that if you ever do anything different than before (or different than the precedent all the previous replicants have set) it will be easily noticeable. The more times you answer the way you typically do the larger the pattern is that you brake when you can't answer the same way. It is all about breaking the mold.
Jan 28, 2018 at 22:04 history edited Möoz
edited tags
Nov 25, 2017 at 14:14 comment added Vanguard3000 I think the idea was that, being a conditioned 'machine', his response times would be consistent within a certain margin or error, as well as faster than a 'real' human. Later in the movie, we see his reaction times falter, indicating a deviation from his normal response times. For his handlers at the LAPD, this warned that he was at risk of 'going rogue'.
Nov 25, 2017 at 11:04 comment added Naib The alternative would be to respond to the non sequitur accusations which itself would indicate emotional response
Nov 24, 2017 at 23:42 review Low quality posts
Nov 25, 2017 at 0:07
Nov 24, 2017 at 23:23 history asked Elisa Elisija CC BY-SA 3.0