Timeline for What would happen if one casts Lumos under the Invisibility Cloak?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Feb 2, 2018 at 8:50 | comment | added | The Dark Lord | Dobby vs Bellatrix: Round Two! | |
Feb 2, 2018 at 6:44 | comment | added | dobby | I agree. The Goblet of Fire point was the perfect answer. I did not remember it. Never thought I would be thanking @Bellatrix though :D | |
Feb 2, 2018 at 6:42 | vote | accept | dobby | ||
Feb 2, 2018 at 3:15 | comment | added | Obsidia | @JesseBarnett Even if the lamp is a fairly secure one, that type of lamp can get hot, to the point where it would seem like a bad idea to have one under a cloak. I personally wouldn’t try using any lamp with a flame that close to fabric. | |
Feb 2, 2018 at 3:05 | comment | added | Jesse | The exert from the book is very helpful. Only thing is that the lamp does not have an open flame, it is semi-securely closed. | |
Feb 2, 2018 at 2:37 | comment | added | Obsidia | @TheDarkLord Thanks so much! I’m glad you like my answer! I’ll add in Xeno’s quote as well! | |
Feb 1, 2018 at 22:29 | comment | added | The Dark Lord | Good find. I think this deserves to be the accepted answer. As a supplementary point, Harry's lit wand couldn't have been seen under the Cloak as the Cloak gives perfect invisibility, at least according to Xeno. | |
Feb 1, 2018 at 22:14 | history | answered | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |