Timeline for How could Dumbledore have opposed the Reasonable Restriction of Underage Sorcery?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2019 at 14:10 | answer | added | Bradley Hewitt | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 21, 2018 at 12:39 | comment | added | Michael Mior | You mention the law was passed in 1874, but the quotation you gave says 1875. | |
| Jun 21, 2018 at 9:19 | vote | accept | TheAsh | ||
| Jun 21, 2018 at 9:19 | vote | accept | TheAsh | ||
| Jun 21, 2018 at 9:19 | |||||
| Jun 21, 2018 at 5:41 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSciFi/status/1009672643031822336 | ||
| Jun 21, 2018 at 3:37 | comment | added | Scott | Dumbledore may have opposed an amendment making the laws stricter or changing their enforcement. The original law for example could have permitted the use of magic for the defence of self or others, and where it was reported to the Ministry within 72 hours. I see no reason to believe there is any contradiction that needs explanation. The Decree has existed in some form since 1875, but the content referred to could have been written at any time since. | |
| Jun 21, 2018 at 2:34 | answer | added | Ryan Leach | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jun 20, 2018 at 17:13 | comment | added | Salmononius2 | As with many things in life, particuarly when dealing with rules and regulations, the fact that it uses words like 'reasonable' does not mean that it is (and frankly, can often be an indicator that it isn't). :P | |
| Jun 20, 2018 at 11:06 | history | edited | SQB | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting; sourced quotes
|
| Jun 20, 2018 at 10:45 | answer | added | DavidS | timeline score: 59 | |
| Jun 20, 2018 at 10:31 | comment | added | F1Krazy | Just because a law was passed before you were born, doesn't mean you can't oppose it. | |
| Jun 20, 2018 at 10:24 | history | asked | TheAsh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |