Skip to main content
Science Fiction & Fantasy

Return to Answer

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Jenayah
Jenayah
  • 58.3k
  • 13
  • 251
  • 336

The problem lies in the fact that the clock is mechanical and weight driven, not electrical (except for the later added backlit dial) because of the fact that it was built in 1885 (no electricity).

Therefore, the electrical current would have never affected the clock at all when it hit the lighteninglightning rod on the top of the building and most likely would have went straight to ground.

The problem lies in the fact that the clock is mechanical and weight driven, not electrical (except for the later added backlit dial) because of the fact that it was built in 1885 (no electricity) Therefore the electrical current would have never affected the clock at all when it hit the lightening rod on the top of the building and most likely would have went straight to ground.

The problem lies in the fact that the clock is mechanical and weight driven, not electrical (except for the later added backlit dial) because of the fact that it was built in 1885 (no electricity).

Therefore, the electrical current would have never affected the clock at all when it hit the lightning rod on the top of the building and most likely would have went straight to ground.

Source Link
Thompsonsclocks
Thompsonsclocks
  • 11
  • 2

The problem lies in the fact that the clock is mechanical and weight driven, not electrical (except for the later added backlit dial) because of the fact that it was built in 1885 (no electricity) Therefore the electrical current would have never affected the clock at all when it hit the lightening rod on the top of the building and most likely would have went straight to ground.