Timeline for What were the crimes of Grindelwald?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2019 at 23:06 | vote | accept | The Dark Lord | ||
| Jan 8, 2019 at 12:11 | comment | added | TheLethalCarrot♦ | FWIW Muggles could not see the black cloths so it wouldn't be violating the Statute of Secrecy. | |
| Dec 8, 2018 at 1:55 | comment | added | Obsidia | @Valorum I’ve been trying really hard to figure that one out! | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 6:29 | comment | added | user89104 | Upvoting yours over the other answer. Yours shows research. The other is just a list. | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 0:50 | comment | added | user64742 | @Valorum it's debatable since it was intended as a call to a meeting to discuss whether or not muggles and wizards should mix and if there was a danger with the current situation (which according to him was the case and based on the visions is in fact true). Barring minor issues of legality of posting notices of a meeting everywhere there's nothing illegal about the meeting itself since it is generally legal to discuss potential desires to protest a law or discuss its relevance. The only thing illegal about it was that a fugitive was the main speaker. | |
| Dec 7, 2018 at 0:22 | history | edited | The Dark Lord | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 6, 2018 at 22:48 | comment | added | Valorum | I would assume that covering an entire city in magical black cloth is some sort of crime. Intimidation, perhaps? | |
| Dec 6, 2018 at 22:15 | history | answered | Obsidia | CC BY-SA 4.0 |