Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 29, 2020 at 4:15 history edited DavidW CC BY-SA 4.0
switch to https
May 30, 2019 at 19:41 history edited Machavity
edited tags
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
S May 19, 2015 at 18:03 history suggested maguirenumber6 CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected title
May 19, 2015 at 17:42 review Suggested edits
S May 19, 2015 at 18:03
Apr 24, 2015 at 17:07 comment added Omegacron Theoretically, wouldn't a blast of plasma continue through a vacuum for an infinite amount of distance without losing any strength? It should only lose cohesion upon contact with other matter...
Jul 9, 2012 at 18:38 answer added Chad timeline score: 5
Jul 9, 2012 at 16:28 comment added John O This is a physics question, assuming that it is a plain laser. I know a flashlight behaves according to square inverse, but I'm not so sure how lasers behave... even with square inverse, it's going to have to be more than a few AUs before I'd want to be in the crosshairs.
Jul 9, 2012 at 12:58 history edited Chad CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jul 9, 2012 at 3:10 comment added vsz @Thaddeus: I didn't say it was a laser, Kevin edited it in.
Jul 8, 2012 at 23:52 comment added Thaddeus Howze Lasers cannot blow up planets. The weapon they are using is not a laser. Lasers cannot create antimatter from matter. It would need to be a particle weapon that is made from antimatter, directed at a planet, annihilating the planet upon contact and creating new antimatter so the entire planet is destroyed. Otherwise the rubble from the explosion would destroy the Death Star as well...
Jul 8, 2012 at 21:43 history edited Kevin CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body; edited title
Jul 8, 2012 at 20:31 answer added Mario timeline score: 14
Jul 8, 2012 at 19:10 history asked vsz CC BY-SA 3.0