Skip to main content

Timeline for Why is the T-1000 humanoid?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 13, 2019 at 17:48 history edited Valorum CC BY-SA 4.0
added 216 characters in body
Sep 13, 2019 at 17:18 history edited Valorum CC BY-SA 4.0
added 23 characters in body
Sep 13, 2019 at 11:07 history edited Valorum CC BY-SA 4.0
added 152 characters in body
Sep 13, 2019 at 8:06 comment added Eric Duminil With all due respect for all your other wonderful answers on this site, this one is quite simply completely wrong.
Sep 12, 2019 at 21:38 comment added RonJohn @Valorum you're absolutely wrong about this. The definition of the adjective "android" is "having human characteristics or form; resembling human beings." dictionary.com/browse/humanoid The suffix -oid means "Of similar form to, but not the same as." en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-oid
Sep 12, 2019 at 14:03 comment added Valorum @NuclearWang - lol. I don't consider someone with four functional arms as humanoid.
Sep 12, 2019 at 14:00 comment added Nuclear Hoagie @Valorum So you do not consider conjoined twins, or people with polymelia to be human?
Sep 12, 2019 at 13:43 comment added Valorum @NuclearWang - Humans don't typically have 4 working arms. That's not even close to being "humanoid"
Sep 12, 2019 at 13:33 comment added Nuclear Hoagie Completely agree with @motoDrizzt - in all of those frames, the T-1000 resembles a human, which is the definition of "humanoid" - it does not require two arms, two legs, ten fingers, etc. It just has to resemble a human, which the T-1000 clearly does most of the time. There are humans out there with no arms or extra arms, are you suggesting that they are not just non-human, but not even humanoid?
Sep 11, 2019 at 8:45 comment added Luaan @motoDrizzt The first image distinctly shows a different skeletal structure to humans. The second doesn't even have opposable thumbs. The third has four arms. And remember it passing through bars? The default body shape is human, because it's primary function is infiltration. We have no idea what the real limitations of the "body" are - remember that it took its appearance from other humans. But in the end, in all these scenes, it changed the body to suit its current purpose. Why change parts that don't need changing?
Sep 11, 2019 at 7:51 comment added motoDrizzt Downvote. None of this examples is non-humanoid.
Sep 10, 2019 at 22:36 comment added computercarguy @Valorum, ever heard of Doc Ock or Goro? ;-) Also Abby and Brittany Hensel had a 3rd arm they had removed, for a reason I can't remember, other than it being basically useless. I know you were being humorous, but en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymelia
Sep 10, 2019 at 21:35 comment added Valorum @DrSheldon - When the T-1000 jumps his bike into the helicopter.
Sep 10, 2019 at 21:19 comment added DrSheldon Could you please identify the scene with the four hands?
Sep 10, 2019 at 15:08 comment added Barmar Consider Inspector Gadget -- isn't he humanoid?
Sep 10, 2019 at 15:07 comment added Barmar I haven't, but if someone were born with that mutation I wouldn't think they weren't humanoid.
Sep 10, 2019 at 15:07 comment added Valorum @Barmar - And the last time you saw someone with 4 arms?
Sep 10, 2019 at 15:00 comment added Barmar Humanoid doesn't mean that it's identical to humans, just similar, and minor differences like these don't conflict with it. The $6M Man could also run really fast, and amputees have hooks in place of hands.
Sep 10, 2019 at 14:17 vote accept Stormblessed
Oct 26, 2019 at 2:53
Sep 10, 2019 at 11:58 history answered Valorum CC BY-SA 4.0